Received: from spf1.us4.outblaze.com (spf1.us4.outblaze.com [205.158.62.23])
	by sdf.lonestar.org (8.13.1/8.12.10) with ESMTP id j17IK2eQ000745
	for <migo@freeshell.org>; Mon, 7 Feb 2005 18:20:03 GMT
Received: from emf.net (emf.emf.net [205.149.0.20])
	by spf1.us4.outblaze.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 29D7E460A74
	for <migo@homemail.com>; Mon,  7 Feb 2005 18:20:44 +0000 (GMT)
Received: (from lord@localhost) by emf.net (K/K) id KAA07607; Mon, 7 Feb 2005 10:20:56 -0800 (PST)
Date: Mon, 7 Feb 2005 10:20:56 -0800 (PST)
From: Tom Lord <lord@emf.net>
Message-Id: <200502071820.KAA07607@emf.net>
To: migo@homemail.com
Cc: gnu-arch-users@gnu.org, gnu-arch-dev@lists.seyza.com
In-reply-to: <20050207181631.GA11858@ukato> (message from Mikhael Goikhman on Mon, 7 Feb 2005 18:16:31 +0000)
Subject: Re: [GNU-arch-dev] Re: GNU Arch status update
Status: RO
Content-Length: 259
Lines: 13


	>> Should I repost it in a separate "[Bug]" thread,

	> Yes please.   (we are talking about command aliases, right?)

oops, no, i see you were talking about --version.

you were also interested in the aliases question, right?

maybe start two threads?

-t