Received: from spf5.us4.outblaze.com (spf5.us4.outblaze.com [205.158.62.27])
	by sdf.lonestar.org (8.13.1/8.12.10) with ESMTP id j17IIvDk029768
	for <migo@freeshell.org>; Mon, 7 Feb 2005 18:18:57 GMT
Received: from emf.net (emf.emf.net [205.149.0.20])
	by spf5.us4.outblaze.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C8D7D77003
	for <migo@homemail.com>; Mon,  7 Feb 2005 18:19:50 +0000 (GMT)
Received: (from lord@localhost) by emf.net (K/K) id KAA07542; Mon, 7 Feb 2005 10:19:50 -0800 (PST)
Date: Mon, 7 Feb 2005 10:19:50 -0800 (PST)
From: Tom Lord <lord@emf.net>
Message-Id: <200502071819.KAA07542@emf.net>
To: migo@homemail.com
Cc: gnu-arch-users@gnu.org, gnu-arch-dev@lists.seyza.com
In-reply-to: <20050207181631.GA11858@ukato> (message from Mikhael Goikhman on Mon, 7 Feb 2005 18:16:31 +0000)
Subject: Re: [GNU-arch-dev] Re: GNU Arch status update
Status: RO
Content-Length: 313
Lines: 14


	> Should I repost it in a separate "[Bug]" thread,

Yes please.   (we are talking about command aliases, right?)

If you would, please quote Conrad's recent point on this list
(include his name and email address).

I'm not sure what the right thing to do is, re aliases, but his
comment gave me pause....


-t