Received: from spf5.us4.outblaze.com (spf5.us4.outblaze.com [205.158.62.27]) by sdf.lonestar.org (8.13.1/8.12.10) with ESMTP id j17HDcF8006067 for ; Mon, 7 Feb 2005 17:13:39 GMT Received: from hera.museatech.net (unknown [207.166.200.220]) by spf5.us4.outblaze.com (Postfix) with SMTP id DF08F76F89 for ; Mon, 7 Feb 2005 17:14:31 +0000 (GMT) Received: (qmail 26977 invoked by uid 110); 7 Feb 2005 17:14:20 -0000 Received: from gnu-arch-dev-bounces@lists.seyza.com by hera by uid 102 with qmail-scanner-1.20 (clamscan: 0.60. spamassassin: 2.60. Clear:RC:1(127.0.0.1):. Processed in 0.030336 secs); 07 Feb 2005 17:14:20 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO hera.museatech.net) (127.0.0.1) by hera.museatech.net with SMTP; 7 Feb 2005 17:14:20 -0000 Delivered-To: list-gnu-arch-dev@lists.seyza.com Received: (qmail 26929 invoked by uid 110); 7 Feb 2005 17:14:16 -0000 Received: from migo@sdf.lonestar.org by hera by uid 102 with qmail-scanner-1.20 (clamscan: 0.60. spamassassin: 2.60. Clear:RC:1(207.166.200.201):. Processed in 0.026211 secs); 07 Feb 2005 17:14:16 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO a1.mx.alal.us) (207.166.200.201) by hera.museatech.net with SMTP; 7 Feb 2005 17:14:16 -0000 Received: (qmail 14158 invoked from network); 7 Feb 2005 18:27:34 -0000 Received: from mx.freeshell.org (HELO sdf.lonestar.org) (192.94.73.21) by a1.mx.alal.us with SMTP; 7 Feb 2005 18:27:31 -0000 Received: from sdf.lonestar.org (IDENT:migo@ukato.freeshell.org [192.94.73.7]) by sdf.lonestar.org (8.13.1/8.12.10) with ESMTP id j17HDDLf005938; Mon, 7 Feb 2005 17:13:13 GMT Received: (from migo@localhost) by sdf.lonestar.org (8.13.1/8.12.8/Submit) id j17HDCJK008224; Mon, 7 Feb 2005 17:13:12 GMT Date: Mon, 7 Feb 2005 17:13:12 +0000 From: Mikhael Goikhman To: Anand Kumria Subject: Re: [GNU-arch-dev] Re: Re: GNU Arch status update Message-ID: <20050207171312.GA28689@ukato> Mail-Followup-To: Anand Kumria , gnu-arch-dev@lists.seyza.com, gnu-arch-users@gnu.org References: <200502062235.j16MZAG0017878@xl2.seyza.com> <20050207152606.GC15171@ukato> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.0.2 (2004-11-16) on dev.alal.com X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.4 required=9.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00, FORGED_RCVD_HELO autolearn=ham version=3.0.2 Cc: gnu-arch-users@gnu.org, gnu-arch-dev@lists.seyza.com X-BeenThere: gnu-arch-dev@lists.seyza.com X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: a mailing list for GNU Arch developers List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: gnu-arch-dev-bounces@lists.seyza.com Errors-To: gnu-arch-dev-bounces@lists.seyza.com Status: RO Content-Length: 1193 Lines: 31 On 08 Feb 2005 03:04:20 +1100, Anand Kumria wrote: > > I think tla delete and tla move should go; tla rm and tla mv fit what > happens for most Unix people and tla delete-id and tla move-id remain to > fixup any sticky problems. > > I'm not attached particularly over which (delete-id/delete; move-id/move) > of these should be removed but I don't think having both is useful. My > reason for suggesting that you keep the '-id' suffixed versions is > because otherwise it is hard to distinguish what the difference between > 'tla move' and 'tla mv' really is. That makes tla harder for a newcomer > to approach it. It is possible that "move" should be re-aliased from "move-id" to "mv", however I think it is good to have this complete list of 5 commands: add (alias: add-id) delete (alias: delete-id) rm (alias: remove) mv (alias: move?, rename) move-id (alias: move?) I am not sure why people think aliases are bad. cvs and svn have a lot of them and feel no concern for this. Regards, Mikhael. _______________________________________________ Gnu-arch-dev mailing list Gnu-arch-dev@lists.seyza.com http://lists.seyza.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/gnu-arch-dev