Date: Mon, 7 Feb 2005 08:43:02 -0800 (PST)
From: Tom Lord <lord@emf.net>
Message-Id: <200502071643.IAA03701@emf.net>
To: migo@homemail.com
Cc: gnu-arch-users@gnu.org, gnu-arch-dev@lists.seyza.com
In-reply-to: <20050207152606.GC15171@ukato> (message from Mikhael Goikhman on Mon, 7 Feb 2005 15:26:06 +0000)
Subject: Re: [GNU-arch-dev] Re: GNU Arch status update
Status: RO
Content-Length: 788
Lines: 23


   From: Mikhael Goikhman <migo@homemail.com>

   I agree with your other suggestions. I should add that changing
   "tla --version" as mentioned in another place is very important too,
   to easier detect tla 1.4 that introduces several interface changes.

BTW, FYI: I don't think bug czar's should go "fishing" to extract bugs
from off-hand comments in threads like this.

It's up to bug submitters to do enough work to get an ack or nack
about whether their report is recorded as a bug.

It's the duty of czar's to make that pretty easy --- but not so easy
that user's can wind up creating bug reports by accident.

In that light, I've taken your comment there not as a bug report, but
as a conversation starter with the list --- "should i try to file a bug
report about ____?"


-t