To: mlh@zipworld.com.au
References: <buosm49p0kh.fsf@mctpc71.ucom.lsi.nec.co.jp>
	<20050207125927.GA24662@zipworld.com.au>
From: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
Date: Mon, 07 Feb 2005 14:18:43 +0000
In-Reply-To: <20050207125927.GA24662@zipworld.com.au> (mlh@zipworld.com.au's
	message of "Mon, 7 Feb 2005 23:59:27 +1100")
Message-ID: <tnxhdko3130.fsf@arm.com>
User-Agent: Gnus/5.1007 (Gnus v5.10.7) Emacs/21.3 (gnu/linux)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Cc: gnu-arch-users@gnu.org, Miles Bader <miles@gnu.org>
Subject: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: [Mark Mitchell] Moving to an alternate VCS
Precedence: list
Sender: gnu-arch-users-bounces+migo=homemail.com@gnu.org
Errors-To: gnu-arch-users-bounces+migo=homemail.com@gnu.org
Status: RO
Content-Length: 801
Lines: 31
mlh@zipworld.com.au wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 07, 2005 at 11:26:38AM +0900, Miles Bader wrote:
>> FYI
>> 
>> [I made some mention of arch, but was ignored.]
>> 
>> -Miles
>
> I couldn't find your message in the gcc mail archives.
> I found the thread, but not your message.  Did something
> go wrong?

It is in the gmane archive:

http://article.gmane.org/gmane.comp.gcc.devel/61212

but, unfortunately, there was no reply to it (maybe the message didn't
emphasise enough the real benefits of using GNU Arch). It would also
solve their bandwidth problem better than Subversion.

Catalin


_______________________________________________
Gnu-arch-users mailing list
Gnu-arch-users@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnu-arch-users

GNU arch home page:
http://savannah.gnu.org/projects/gnu-arch/