Received: from spf5.us4.outblaze.com (spf5.us4.outblaze.com [205.158.62.27]) by sdf.lonestar.org (8.13.1/8.12.10) with ESMTP id j175BRCj016175 for ; Mon, 7 Feb 2005 05:11:28 GMT Received: from lists.gnu.org (lists.gnu.org [199.232.76.165]) by spf5.us4.outblaze.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id BDD4976F4B for ; Mon, 7 Feb 2005 05:12:19 +0000 (GMT) Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Cy1P0-0002LN-TZ for migo@homemail.com; Mon, 07 Feb 2005 00:25:38 -0500 Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1Cy1OS-0002Jn-FT for gnu-arch-users@gnu.org; Mon, 07 Feb 2005 00:25:04 -0500 Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1Cy1OO-0002H2-Db for gnu-arch-users@gnu.org; Mon, 07 Feb 2005 00:25:02 -0500 Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Cy1ON-0002E7-MM for gnu-arch-users@gnu.org; Mon, 07 Feb 2005 00:24:59 -0500 Received: from [210.143.35.51] (helo=tyo201.gate.nec.co.jp) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.34) id 1Cy0wn-0003TN-TN; Sun, 06 Feb 2005 23:56:30 -0500 Received: from mailgate4.nec.co.jp (mailgate54.nec.co.jp [10.7.69.193]) by tyo201.gate.nec.co.jp (8.11.7/3.7W01080315) with ESMTP id j174u9704542; Mon, 7 Feb 2005 13:56:09 +0900 (JST) Received: (from root@localhost) by mailgate4.nec.co.jp (8.11.7/3.7W-MAILGATE-NEC) id j174u9c26050; Mon, 7 Feb 2005 13:56:09 +0900 (JST) Received: from edtmg04.lsi.nec.co.jp ([10.26.17.201]) by mailsv3.nec.co.jp (8.11.7/3.7W-MAILSV4-NEC) with ESMTP id j174u8228878; Mon, 7 Feb 2005 13:56:08 +0900 (JST) Received: from mcsss2.ucom.lsi.nec.co.jp (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by edtmg04.lsi.nec.co.jp (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id j174u5rn009896; Mon, 7 Feb 2005 13:56:07 +0900 (JST) Received: from mctpc71 (mctpc71.ucom.lsi.nec.co.jp [10.30.118.121]) by mcsss2.ucom.lsi.nec.co.jp (8.12.10/8.12.8/EDcg v2.01-mc/1046780839) with ESMTP id j174u4Kt004136; Mon, 7 Feb 2005 13:56:04 +0900 (JST) Received: by mctpc71 (Postfix, from userid 31295) id 4373B13; Mon, 7 Feb 2005 13:56:03 +0900 (JST) To: Catalin Marinas References: <1103646999.28012.117.camel@pc1117> <20050204131006.GB4299@linux-sh.org> From: Miles Bader System-Type: i686-pc-linux-gnu Blat: Foop Date: Mon, 07 Feb 2005 13:56:03 +0900 In-Reply-To: (Catalin Marinas's message of "Sat, 05 Feb 2005 21:51:24 +0000") Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: gnu-arch-users@gnu.org, snogglethorpe@gmail.com, Cliff Brake , Miika Komu , Paul Mundt Subject: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: arch performance with large trees X-BeenThere: gnu-arch-users@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: Miles Bader List-Id: a discussion list for all things arch-ish List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: gnu-arch-users-bounces+migo=homemail.com@gnu.org Errors-To: gnu-arch-users-bounces+migo=homemail.com@gnu.org Status: RO Content-Length: 500 Lines: 12 Catalin Marinas writes: > Still one more problem: the BKCVS log seems to only contain the first > part of the message. It does not include any of the file > descriptions. Do you have a link to an example? Thanks, -Miles -- Do not taunt Happy Fun Ball. _______________________________________________ Gnu-arch-users mailing list Gnu-arch-users@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnu-arch-users GNU arch home page: http://savannah.gnu.org/projects/gnu-arch/