Received: from spf5.us4.outblaze.com (spf5.us4.outblaze.com [205.158.62.27]) by sdf.lonestar.org (8.13.1/8.12.10) with ESMTP id j1739uCX020152 for ; Mon, 7 Feb 2005 03:09:56 GMT Received: from lists.gnu.org (lists.gnu.org [199.232.76.165]) by spf5.us4.outblaze.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6629B76FE7 for ; Mon, 7 Feb 2005 03:10:48 +0000 (GMT) Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1CxzVP-0004Sg-PC for migo@homemail.com; Sun, 06 Feb 2005 22:24:07 -0500 Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1CxzUF-00043c-Od for gnu-arch-users@gnu.org; Sun, 06 Feb 2005 22:22:56 -0500 Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1CxzUA-00040R-Gk for gnu-arch-users@gnu.org; Sun, 06 Feb 2005 22:22:52 -0500 Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1CxzUA-0003yu-64 for gnu-arch-users@gnu.org; Sun, 06 Feb 2005 22:22:50 -0500 Received: from [202.32.8.202] (helo=tyo202.gate.nec.co.jp) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.34) id 1Cxz95-0006Qk-A0; Sun, 06 Feb 2005 22:01:03 -0500 Received: from mailgate4.nec.co.jp (mailgate54.nec.co.jp [10.7.69.197]) by tyo202.gate.nec.co.jp (8.11.7/3.7W01080315) with ESMTP id j17311g03836; Mon, 7 Feb 2005 12:01:01 +0900 (JST) Received: (from root@localhost) by mailgate4.nec.co.jp (8.11.7/3.7W-MAILGATE-NEC) id j17311C28866; Mon, 7 Feb 2005 12:01:01 +0900 (JST) Received: from edsgm01.lsi.nec.co.jp ([10.50.208.11]) by mailsv4.nec.co.jp (8.11.7/3.7W-MAILSV4-NEC) with ESMTP id j17310E01460; Mon, 7 Feb 2005 12:01:00 +0900 (JST) Received: from mcsss2.ucom.lsi.nec.co.jp (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by edsgm01.lsi.nec.co.jp (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id j172QhRE016360; Mon, 7 Feb 2005 11:26:44 +0900 (JST) Received: from mctpc71 (mctpc71.ucom.lsi.nec.co.jp [10.30.118.121]) by mcsss2.ucom.lsi.nec.co.jp (8.12.10/8.12.8/EDcg v2.01-mc/1046780839) with ESMTP id j172QcKt003798; Mon, 7 Feb 2005 11:26:38 +0900 (JST) Received: by mctpc71 (Postfix, from userid 31295) id 3DAD53C; Mon, 7 Feb 2005 11:26:38 +0900 (JST) To: gnu-arch-users@gnu.org From: Miles Bader System-Type: i686-pc-linux-gnu Blat: Foop Date: Mon, 07 Feb 2005 11:26:38 +0900 Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="=-=-=" Subject: [Gnu-arch-users] [Mark Mitchell] Moving to an alternate VCS X-BeenThere: gnu-arch-users@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: Miles Bader List-Id: a discussion list for all things arch-ish List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: gnu-arch-users-bounces+migo=homemail.com@gnu.org Errors-To: gnu-arch-users-bounces+migo=homemail.com@gnu.org Status: RO Content-Length: 2214 Lines: 51 --=-=-= FYI [I made some mention of arch, but was ignored.] -Miles --=-=-= Content-Type: message/rfc822 Content-Disposition: inline Mailing-List: contact gcc-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Delivered-To: mailing list gcc@gcc.gnu.org Message-ID: <4202C620.6000304@codesourcery.com> Date: Thu, 03 Feb 2005 16:47:28 -0800 From: Mark Mitchell Organization: CodeSourcery, LLC To: Daniel Berlin CC: gcc@gcc.gnu.org, gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org Subject: Re: Moving to an alternate VCS References: In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Daniel Berlin wrote: > While sitting here waiting 3 hours for the tagging operation to complete > on the server, for probably the 20th time in 3 months, i've had a lot of > time to explore our opportunities to move to a version control system > that doesn't suck[1]. I have no objection to moving Subversion. I would suggest that the right way to proceed would be ala the conversion to Bugzilla; figure out how to do the conversion, and do it, producing a version of the repository in subversion format. Let people play with that a bit, including doing dummy check-ins to validate post check-in scripts, updating (new versions of) our web pages, etc., and then convert to it after the kinks are worked out. I would not recommend trying to get the rest of the "src" repository on board at this time. It would be nice to have a plan for doing that, at some point, but that's a level of coordination that I would not recommend imposing on ourselves. -- Mark Mitchell CodeSourcery, LLC mark@codesourcery.com (916) 791-8304 --=-=-= -- Come now, if we were really planning to harm you, would we be waiting here, beside the path, in the very darkest part of the forest? --=-=-= Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline _______________________________________________ Gnu-arch-users mailing list Gnu-arch-users@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnu-arch-users GNU arch home page: http://savannah.gnu.org/projects/gnu-arch/ --=-=-=--