Received: from spf3.us4.outblaze.com (spf3.us4.outblaze.com [205.158.62.25]) by sdf.lonestar.org (8.13.1/8.12.10) with ESMTP id j159Kf6Y001998 for ; Sat, 5 Feb 2005 09:20:41 GMT Received: from lists.gnu.org (lists.gnu.org [199.232.76.165]) by spf3.us4.outblaze.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 122C453995 for ; Sat, 5 Feb 2005 09:21:30 +0000 (GMT) Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1CxMHr-0000n1-33 for migo@homemail.com; Sat, 05 Feb 2005 04:31:32 -0500 Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1CxMC3-0000lq-9y for gnu-arch-users@gnu.org; Sat, 05 Feb 2005 04:25:31 -0500 Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1CxMBx-0000kg-OJ for gnu-arch-users@gnu.org; Sat, 05 Feb 2005 04:25:27 -0500 Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1CxMBu-0000kN-VQ for gnu-arch-users@gnu.org; Sat, 05 Feb 2005 04:25:23 -0500 Received: from [193.131.176.58] (helo=cam-admin0.cambridge.arm.com) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.34) id 1CxLt9-0007zh-OZ; Sat, 05 Feb 2005 04:06:00 -0500 Received: from cam-mail2.cambridge.arm.com (cam-mail2.cambridge.arm.com [10.1.127.39]) by cam-admin0.cambridge.arm.com (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id j1594h4m006743; Sat, 5 Feb 2005 09:04:43 GMT Received: from localhost.localdomain (cmarinas@pc1117.cambridge.arm.com [10.1.69.139]) by cam-mail2.cambridge.arm.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id JAA20358; Sat, 5 Feb 2005 09:05:47 GMT To: snogglethorpe@gmail.com Subject: Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: arch performance with large trees References: <1103646999.28012.117.camel@pc1117> <20050204131006.GB4299@linux-sh.org> From: Catalin Marinas Date: Sat, 05 Feb 2005 09:06:10 +0000 In-Reply-To: (Miles Bader's message of "Sat, 5 Feb 2005 17:42:58 +0900") Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.1007 (Gnus v5.10.7) Emacs/21.3 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: gnu-arch-users@gnu.org, Paul Mundt , Cliff Brake , Miika Komu , miles@gnu.org X-BeenThere: gnu-arch-users@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: a discussion list for all things arch-ish List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: gnu-arch-users-bounces+migo=homemail.com@gnu.org Errors-To: gnu-arch-users-bounces+migo=homemail.com@gnu.org Status: RO Content-Length: 1249 Lines: 30 Miles Bader writes: > I think this tool generates "real" renames, and seem to show up on > bkbits.net -- e.g., if you look at the diffs for a changeset, you'll > see a file patch where the before and after names are different. [...] > --- 1.12/drivers/serial/nb85e_uart.c 2005-02-05 00:37:24 -08:00 > +++ 1.13/drivers/serial/v850e_uart.c 2005-02-05 00:37:24 -08:00 Ah, I thought I would see something like old_file -> new_file in the log. The patch available through BKCVS (and http://linux.bkbits.net:8080/linux-2.5/user=miles/gnupatch@3f182a18fK70hG0Z8Oi4JmJ34CkUZA) does a full delete/add of these files so the information would need to be retrieved from bkbits.net. Larry McVoy stated that it is OK to retrieve some meta information but not the patch itself. You would actually need to access the file diff from bkbits.net to get this information (it is true that you only do this if you have a pair of removed/added files, so he might accept this but it probably needs to be asked first). Catalin _______________________________________________ Gnu-arch-users mailing list Gnu-arch-users@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnu-arch-users GNU arch home page: http://savannah.gnu.org/projects/gnu-arch/