Received: from spf3.us4.outblaze.com (spf3.us4.outblaze.com [205.158.62.25]) by sdf.lonestar.org (8.13.1/8.12.10) with ESMTP id j158qoOE025872 for ; Sat, 5 Feb 2005 08:52:50 GMT Received: from lists.gnu.org (lists.gnu.org [199.232.76.165]) by spf3.us4.outblaze.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0AF5453AD5 for ; Sat, 5 Feb 2005 08:53:29 +0000 (GMT) Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1CxLtp-0005nv-Kq for migo@homemail.com; Sat, 05 Feb 2005 04:06:41 -0500 Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1CxLkC-0003Ju-PQ for gnu-arch-users@gnu.org; Sat, 05 Feb 2005 03:56:45 -0500 Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1CxLk6-0003II-Sr for gnu-arch-users@gnu.org; Sat, 05 Feb 2005 03:56:40 -0500 Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1CxLk4-00038Q-HV for gnu-arch-users@gnu.org; Sat, 05 Feb 2005 03:56:37 -0500 Received: from [64.233.184.205] (helo=wproxy.gmail.com) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.34) id 1CxL6d-0004dm-MN for gnu-arch-users@gnu.org; Sat, 05 Feb 2005 03:15:51 -0500 Received: by wproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id 36so433043wri for ; Sat, 05 Feb 2005 00:15:51 -0800 (PST) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:reply-to:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:references; b=WdbhVorwUrhASQryDu/6moXERpO4wr+ewdS5Ym/2NQkUrNDoN/qX0V6h2ylhQ3W34nd+49keXsDhde0/h9TNGod+Pw1rvzTm/6hyG6CO4byMddr3gAssW8tl5O4Ipci4zIthICfJHdg4oo76tKHRsjEi+vTBLpg1kMOJJ6so9Cs= Received: by 10.54.19.29 with SMTP id 29mr454353wrs; Sat, 05 Feb 2005 00:15:51 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.54.19.59 with HTTP; Sat, 5 Feb 2005 00:15:50 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: Date: Sat, 5 Feb 2005 17:15:50 +0900 From: Miles Bader To: snogglethorpe@gmail.com, miles@gnu.org, John A Meinel , "John S. Yates, Jr." , gnu-arch-users@gnu.org Subject: Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: release goals for Bazaar 1.1 In-Reply-To: <20050205070604.GB18959@ukato> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit References: <1102095916.6942.43.camel@localhost> <20041211154916.GA1832@ukato> <20041211183809.GC3388@wisq.net> <873byasd73.fsf@tleepslib.sk.tsukuba.ac.jp> <41BDADF5.5070507@arbash-meinel.com> <20050205024050.GB26365@ukato> <20050205070604.GB18959@ukato> Cc: X-BeenThere: gnu-arch-users@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: snogglethorpe@gmail.com, miles@gnu.org List-Id: a discussion list for all things arch-ish List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: gnu-arch-users-bounces+migo=homemail.com@gnu.org Errors-To: gnu-arch-users-bounces+migo=homemail.com@gnu.org Status: RO Content-Length: 613 Lines: 19 On Sat, 5 Feb 2005 07:06:04 +0000, Mikhael Goikhman wrote: > Maybe it is because I never want to know _who_ wrote the code when I run > "cvs annotate" (I know the people working on this file or this function), > but _why_ and _when_ they wrote this code. [cvs misses --summary option.] IN that sense, "annotate" is a very good name. -Miles -- Do not taunt Happy Fun Ball. _______________________________________________ Gnu-arch-users mailing list Gnu-arch-users@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnu-arch-users GNU arch home page: http://savannah.gnu.org/projects/gnu-arch/