To: gnu-arch-users@gnu.org
Mail-Followup-To: gnu-arch-users@gnu.org
Subject: Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Bazaar and TLA compatability?
References: <200501311632.IAA18547@emf.net>
From: Matthew Dempsky <jivera@flame.org>
Date: Fri, 04 Feb 2005 13:02:49 -0600
In-Reply-To: <200501311632.IAA18547@emf.net> (Tom Lord's message of "Mon, 31
	Jan 2005 08:32:26 -0800 (PST)")
Message-ID: <87zmyk5esm.fsf@flame.org>
User-Agent: Gnus/5.1007 (Gnus v5.10.7) Emacs/21.3 (gnu/linux)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Precedence: list
Sender: gnu-arch-users-bounces+migo=homemail.com@gnu.org
Errors-To: gnu-arch-users-bounces+migo=homemail.com@gnu.org
Status: RO
Content-Length: 1088
Lines: 29
Tom Lord <lord@emf.net> writes:

>    From: Matthew Dempsky <jivera@flame.org>
>
>    Colin Fox <cfox@cfconsulting.ca> writes:
>
>    > Is baz 100% compatable with tla as far as the archive is concerned? In
>    > other words, if I've been using TLA for a while, can I just start using
>    > bazaar, or do I have to start with bazaar from scratch?
>
>    As far as I understand it, the only incompatibility between tla and
>    baz are some command names, and baz has a new archive format, but
>    maintains compatibility with tla's current format and you can still
>    create archives with the old format with a command line argument.
>
> Is there any reason to not merge the code for their new archive format 
> into GNU Arch?

Sorry, I meant to reply to this earlier, but the short answer is 'no',
and support for the new archive has been merged into tla-1.4pre1.


_______________________________________________
Gnu-arch-users mailing list
Gnu-arch-users@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnu-arch-users

GNU arch home page:
http://savannah.gnu.org/projects/gnu-arch/