Received: from spf5.us4.outblaze.com (spf5.us4.outblaze.com [205.158.62.27]) by sdf.lonestar.org (8.13.1/8.12.10) with ESMTP id j12MqtfF021398 for ; Wed, 2 Feb 2005 22:52:55 GMT Received: from lists.gnu.org (lists.gnu.org [199.232.76.165]) by spf5.us4.outblaze.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E606F76FB4 for ; Wed, 2 Feb 2005 22:53:39 +0000 (GMT) Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1CwTaB-00070I-Jr for migo@homemail.com; Wed, 02 Feb 2005 18:06:47 -0500 Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1CwTYt-0006aj-2q for gnu-arch-users@gnu.org; Wed, 02 Feb 2005 18:05:27 -0500 Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1CwTYn-0006Yh-6b for gnu-arch-users@gnu.org; Wed, 02 Feb 2005 18:05:23 -0500 Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1CwTYm-0006Vt-Tr for gnu-arch-users@gnu.org; Wed, 02 Feb 2005 18:05:21 -0500 Received: from [207.115.63.101] (helo=pimout2-ext.prodigy.net) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.34) id 1CwTIe-0000Tz-5l for gnu-arch-users@gnu.org; Wed, 02 Feb 2005 17:48:40 -0500 Received: from trex-int.prodigy.net (trex-ext.prodigy.net [207.115.61.57]) by pimout2-ext.prodigy.net (8.12.10 milter /8.12.10) with SMTP id j12Mmddc418032 for gnu-arch-users@gnu.org; Wed, 2 Feb 2005 17:48:39 -0500 To: gnu-arch-users@gnu.org Message-Id: Date: Wed, 02 Feb 2005 17:48:39 -0500 From: "Robert Anderson" Subject: [Gnu-arch-users] config command idea X-BeenThere: gnu-arch-users@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: a discussion list for all things arch-ish List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: gnu-arch-users-bounces+migo=homemail.com@gnu.org Errors-To: gnu-arch-users-bounces+migo=homemail.com@gnu.org Status: RO Content-Length: 990 Lines: 33 I often have phone/chat/email conversations that go like this: Guy: "I'm having problem X with your software that I checked out of the repository." Me: "Which configuration did you build?" Guy: "Which what? Oh, I don't remember. Y, or maybe Z. How do I check?" At which point I usually go over to their office and take over the keyboard. I think there needs to be at the very least a command "Is this directory consistent with configuration X" which means "for each directory listed in config X, does the tree-version match that in the config." This is robust with manual tweaking, unlike leaving some kind of dropping somewhere when a config is built. What you'd really want is "what config(s) is this set of trees consistent with" but that seems harder. Bob _______________________________________________ Gnu-arch-users mailing list Gnu-arch-users@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnu-arch-users GNU arch home page: http://savannah.gnu.org/projects/gnu-arch/