Date: Mon, 31 Jan 2005 08:32:26 -0800 (PST)
From: Tom Lord <lord@emf.net>
Message-Id: <200501311632.IAA18547@emf.net>
To: jivera@flame.org
In-reply-to: <874qgyp6p7.fsf@flame.org> (message from Matthew Dempsky on Sun,
	30 Jan 2005 22:23:48 -0600)
Subject: Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Bazaar and TLA compatability?
Cc: gnu-arch-users@gnu.org
Precedence: list
Sender: gnu-arch-users-bounces+migo=homemail.com@gnu.org
Errors-To: gnu-arch-users-bounces+migo=homemail.com@gnu.org
Status: RO
Content-Length: 897
Lines: 28

   From: Matthew Dempsky <jivera@flame.org>

   Colin Fox <cfox@cfconsulting.ca> writes:

   > Is baz 100% compatable with tla as far as the archive is concerned? In
   > other words, if I've been using TLA for a while, can I just start using
   > bazaar, or do I have to start with bazaar from scratch?

   As far as I understand it, the only incompatibility between tla and
   baz are some command names, and baz has a new archive format, but
   maintains compatibility with tla's current format and you can still
   create archives with the old format with a command line argument.

Is there any reason to not merge the code for their new archive format 
into GNU Arch?

-t


_______________________________________________
Gnu-arch-users mailing list
Gnu-arch-users@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnu-arch-users

GNU arch home page:
http://savannah.gnu.org/projects/gnu-arch/