Received: from spf3.us4.outblaze.com (spf3.us4.outblaze.com [205.158.62.25]) by sdf.lonestar.org (8.13.1/8.12.10) with ESMTP id j0V7Oumo025926 for ; Mon, 31 Jan 2005 07:24:57 GMT Received: from lists.gnu.org (lists.gnu.org [199.232.76.165]) by spf3.us4.outblaze.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D1CC8538D0 for ; Mon, 31 Jan 2005 07:25:36 +0000 (GMT) Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1CvW8p-0007KE-Ik for migo@homemail.com; Mon, 31 Jan 2005 02:38:35 -0500 Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1CvW8D-0007JT-8U for gnu-arch-users@gnu.org; Mon, 31 Jan 2005 02:37:57 -0500 Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1CvW8A-0007He-B3 for gnu-arch-users@gnu.org; Mon, 31 Jan 2005 02:37:56 -0500 Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1CvW8A-0007H5-7x for gnu-arch-users@gnu.org; Mon, 31 Jan 2005 02:37:54 -0500 Received: from [212.71.168.94] (helo=vagabond.light.src) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.34) id 1CvVuh-0006fz-Qv for gnu-arch-users@gnu.org; Mon, 31 Jan 2005 02:24:00 -0500 Received: from bulb by vagabond.light.src with local (Exim 3.36 #1 (Debian)) id 1CvVua-0003CA-00; Mon, 31 Jan 2005 08:23:52 +0100 Date: Mon, 31 Jan 2005 08:23:52 +0100 From: Jan Hudec To: Colin Fox Subject: Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Bazaar and TLA compatability? Message-ID: <20050131072351.GA11836@vagabond> References: <41FDA060.9050107@cfconsulting.ca> Mime-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <41FDA060.9050107@cfconsulting.ca> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.6+20040907i Cc: gnu-arch-users@gnu.org X-BeenThere: gnu-arch-users@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: a discussion list for all things arch-ish List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="===============2018627262==" Sender: gnu-arch-users-bounces+migo=homemail.com@gnu.org Errors-To: gnu-arch-users-bounces+migo=homemail.com@gnu.org Status: RO Content-Length: 1933 Lines: 65 --===============2018627262== Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="BXVAT5kNtrzKuDFl" Content-Disposition: inline --BXVAT5kNtrzKuDFl Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline On Sun, Jan 30, 2005 at 19:05:04 -0800, Colin Fox wrote: > Is baz 100% compatable with tla as far as the archive is concerned? In It's not 100% compatible. It is backwards compatible. > other words, if I've been using TLA for a while, can I just start using > bazaar, or do I have to start with bazaar from scratch? You can start using bazaar without any problems. > And for the developers working on a project, can some people use tla and > some baz with no issues? No. IIRC bazaar uses an improved archive, that did not make it in tla yet. So while baz can always work with archives created with tla, tla might not be able to work with archives created with baz. The new format is expected to be implemented in next version of tla so then they should be compatible again. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Jan 'Bulb' Hudec --BXVAT5kNtrzKuDFl Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: Digital signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.5 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFB/d0HRel1vVwhjGURAsDVAKDIeXlt3M17q2ZAF28YfMYBnXUIIQCfcPX2 cqdAybnTi8dhV+aloXOX7IU= =pLPe -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --BXVAT5kNtrzKuDFl-- --===============2018627262== Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline _______________________________________________ Gnu-arch-users mailing list Gnu-arch-users@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnu-arch-users GNU arch home page: http://savannah.gnu.org/projects/gnu-arch/ --===============2018627262==--