Received: from spf5.us4.outblaze.com (spf5.us4.outblaze.com [205.158.62.27]) by sdf.lonestar.org (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id j0V4SYAN026164 for ; Mon, 31 Jan 2005 04:28:35 GMT Received: from lists.gnu.org (lists.gnu.org [199.232.76.165]) by spf5.us4.outblaze.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A872C76FE5 for ; Mon, 31 Jan 2005 04:29:11 +0000 (GMT) Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1CvTO6-0005sP-GL for migo@homemail.com; Sun, 30 Jan 2005 23:42:10 -0500 Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1CvTN8-0005XS-8p for gnu-arch-users@gnu.org; Sun, 30 Jan 2005 23:41:10 -0500 Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1CvTN2-0005Rv-HU for gnu-arch-users@gnu.org; Sun, 30 Jan 2005 23:41:05 -0500 Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1CvTN0-0005QQ-Rd for gnu-arch-users@gnu.org; Sun, 30 Jan 2005 23:41:02 -0500 Received: from [204.152.186.145] (helo=kechara.flame.org) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (TLSv1:DES-CBC3-SHA:168) (Exim 4.34) id 1CvT3y-0001rl-Fs for gnu-arch-users@gnu.org; Sun, 30 Jan 2005 23:21:22 -0500 Received: (qmail 23006 invoked by uid 323); 31 Jan 2005 04:21:19 -0000 To: gnu-arch-users@gnu.org Mail-Followup-To: gnu-arch-users@gnu.org Subject: Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Bazaar and TLA compatability? References: <41FDA060.9050107@cfconsulting.ca> From: Matthew Dempsky Date: Sun, 30 Jan 2005 22:23:48 -0600 In-Reply-To: <41FDA060.9050107@cfconsulting.ca> (Colin Fox's message of "Sun, 30 Jan 2005 19:05:04 -0800") Message-ID: <874qgyp6p7.fsf@flame.org> User-Agent: Gnus/5.1007 (Gnus v5.10.7) Emacs/21.3 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-BeenThere: gnu-arch-users@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: a discussion list for all things arch-ish List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: gnu-arch-users-bounces+migo=homemail.com@gnu.org Errors-To: gnu-arch-users-bounces+migo=homemail.com@gnu.org Status: RO Content-Length: 734 Lines: 19 Colin Fox writes: > Is baz 100% compatable with tla as far as the archive is concerned? In > other words, if I've been using TLA for a while, can I just start using > bazaar, or do I have to start with bazaar from scratch? As far as I understand it, the only incompatibility between tla and baz are some command names, and baz has a new archive format, but maintains compatibility with tla's current format and you can still create archives with the old format with a command line argument. _______________________________________________ Gnu-arch-users mailing list Gnu-arch-users@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnu-arch-users GNU arch home page: http://savannah.gnu.org/projects/gnu-arch/