Received: from spf1.us4.outblaze.com (spf1.us4.outblaze.com [205.158.62.23]) by sdf.lonestar.org (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id j0SNMNYB027761 for ; Fri, 28 Jan 2005 23:22:23 GMT Received: from lists.gnu.org (lists.gnu.org [199.232.76.165]) by spf1.us4.outblaze.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2D801298436 for ; Fri, 28 Jan 2005 23:22:59 +0000 (GMT) Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1CufeY-0000k7-1B for migo@homemail.com; Fri, 28 Jan 2005 18:35:50 -0500 Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1CufcE-0008U0-3G for gnu-arch-users@gnu.org; Fri, 28 Jan 2005 18:33:26 -0500 Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1Cufbz-0008KL-Ud for gnu-arch-users@gnu.org; Fri, 28 Jan 2005 18:33:13 -0500 Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Cufby-0008Gy-5c for gnu-arch-users@gnu.org; Fri, 28 Jan 2005 18:33:10 -0500 Received: from [203.22.251.251] (helo=mg2.works.net.au) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (TLSv1:DES-CBC3-SHA:168) (Exim 4.34) id 1CufE0-00062X-Un for gnu-arch-users@gnu.org; Fri, 28 Jan 2005 18:08:25 -0500 Received: from aardvark.ozdial.net.au (aardvark.ozdial.net.au [203.22.251.121]) by mg2.works.net.au (8.12.11/linuxconf) with ESMTP id j0SN8Ete017523; Sat, 29 Jan 2005 10:08:14 +1100 Received: from lifelesswks.robertcollins.net (dsl-149.7.240.220.rns01-kent-syd.dsl.comindico.com.au [220.240.7.149]) by aardvark.ozdial.net.au (8.12.8/linuxconf) with ESMTP id j0SN8DoG028009; Sat, 29 Jan 2005 10:08:14 +1100 Received: from [3ffe:8002:1004:0:20e:35ff:fe07:eee9] (helo=lifelesslap.robertcollins.net ident=Debian-exim) by lifelesswks.robertcollins.net with asmtp (Exim 4.34) id 1CufDp-0007j2-OU; Sat, 29 Jan 2005 10:08:13 +1100 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] ident=robertc) by lifelesslap.robertcollins.net with esmtp (Exim 4.34) id 1CufDM-0006oI-Hs; Sat, 29 Jan 2005 10:07:44 +1100 Subject: Re: [Gnu-arch-users] What's the rationale behind the cmd-build-config.c restrictions? From: Robert Collins To: Matthew Dempsky In-Reply-To: <87mzut5l5k.fsf@flame.org> References: <87zmyu50ym.fsf@trouble.defaultvalue.org> <87mzut5l5k.fsf@flame.org> Date: Sat, 29 Jan 2005 10:07:44 +1100 Message-Id: <1106953664.825.25.camel@localhost> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.1.3.2 X-MG2-Works-MailScanner-Information: Please contact the ISP for more information X-MG2-Works-MailScanner: Found to be clean X-MG2-Works-MailScanner-SpamCheck: not spam, SpamAssassin (score=-4.285, required 5, BAYES_00 -4.90, RCVD_IN_NJABL_DUL 0.53, RCVD_IN_SORBS_DUL 0.09) X-MailScanner-From: rbcollins@cygwin.com Cc: gnu-arch-users@gnu.org X-BeenThere: gnu-arch-users@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: a discussion list for all things arch-ish List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="===============1219648269==" Sender: gnu-arch-users-bounces+migo=homemail.com@gnu.org Errors-To: gnu-arch-users-bounces+migo=homemail.com@gnu.org Status: RO Content-Length: 1881 Lines: 68 --===============1219648269== Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="=-gjbwGujwJOo0XKYjdXFv" --=-gjbwGujwJOo0XKYjdXFv Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Fri, 2005-01-28 at 14:55 -0600, Matthew Dempsky wrote: > Rob Browning writes: >=20 > > What's the rationale behind these restrictions? >=20 > Mostly it's because the config is built relative to the tree root. I > suppose you could add a -d option (or something) for where the tree > root should be located instead, and then it's no longer necessary to > be in an arch tree. I never added 'find the root and build from there' or the 'require a root' to config-manager, yet it was still very useful ;). In terms of impact, only scripts that cd somewhere other than the tree root before running *-config commands will be impacted. It uses -d to determine where to build the config. I think that removing the constraints, and the heuristic search path to the config, and then adding -d would be best from UI point of view. Rob --=-gjbwGujwJOo0XKYjdXFv Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.5 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQBB+sXAM4BfeEKYx2ERAnklAKCA69EoiKs6PZm4swZ6re+PUEFoSACdF6LL Nhx7yPn3B30tGMZON8kyWsc= =wK+q -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-gjbwGujwJOo0XKYjdXFv-- --===============1219648269== Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline _______________________________________________ Gnu-arch-users mailing list Gnu-arch-users@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnu-arch-users GNU arch home page: http://savannah.gnu.org/projects/gnu-arch/ --===============1219648269==--