Received: from spf1.us4.outblaze.com (spf1.us4.outblaze.com [205.158.62.23]) by sdf.lonestar.org (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id j0SEVg03023432 for ; Fri, 28 Jan 2005 14:31:44 GMT Received: from lists.gnu.org (lists.gnu.org [199.232.76.165]) by spf1.us4.outblaze.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 38744298637 for ; Fri, 28 Jan 2005 14:32:07 +0000 (GMT) Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1CuXMf-0001Wc-OR for migo@homemail.com; Fri, 28 Jan 2005 09:44:49 -0500 Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1CuXCV-0007YS-QK for gnu-arch-users@gnu.org; Fri, 28 Jan 2005 09:34:20 -0500 Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1CuXCE-0007PK-KL for gnu-arch-users@gnu.org; Fri, 28 Jan 2005 09:34:03 -0500 Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1CuXCD-0007La-D2 for gnu-arch-users@gnu.org; Fri, 28 Jan 2005 09:34:01 -0500 Received: from [83.216.134.182] (helo=cyclone.suffields.me.uk) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.34) id 1CuWqN-0001jS-9e for gnu-arch-users@gnu.org; Fri, 28 Jan 2005 09:11:27 -0500 Received: from asuffield by cyclone.suffields.me.uk with local (Exim 3.36 #1 (Debian)) id 1CuWqK-0001kj-00 for ; Fri, 28 Jan 2005 14:11:24 +0000 Date: Fri, 28 Jan 2005 14:11:24 +0000 From: Andrew Suffield To: gnu-arch-users@gnu.org Subject: Re: [Gnu-arch-users] What's the rationale behind the cmd-build-config.c restrictions? Message-ID: <20050128141124.GD6045@suffields.me.uk> Mail-Followup-To: gnu-arch-users@gnu.org References: <87zmyu50ym.fsf@trouble.defaultvalue.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <87zmyu50ym.fsf@trouble.defaultvalue.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.6+20040907i X-BeenThere: gnu-arch-users@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: a discussion list for all things arch-ish List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="===============2061857412==" Sender: gnu-arch-users-bounces+migo=homemail.com@gnu.org Errors-To: gnu-arch-users-bounces+migo=homemail.com@gnu.org Status: RO Content-Length: 1905 Lines: 75 --===============2061857412== Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="TybLhxa8M7aNoW+V" Content-Disposition: inline --TybLhxa8M7aNoW+V Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Thu, Jan 27, 2005 at 09:46:41AM -0600, Rob Browning wrote: >=20 > In cmd-build-config.c we have: >=20 > if (!arch_valid_config_name (config)) > { > safe_printfmt (2, "%s: invalid config name (%s)\n", > argv[0], config); > exit (2); > } >=20 > tree_root =3D arch_tree_root (0, dir, 0); >=20 > if (!tree_root) > { > safe_printfmt (2, "%s: not in project tree (%s)\n", > argv[0], dir); > exit (1); > } >=20 > What's the rationale behind these restrictions? Nothing relevant, it's a bug. It's a very old bug that should have been fixed a long time ago. --=20 .''`. ** Debian GNU/Linux ** | Andrew Suffield : :' : http://www.debian.org/ | `. `' | `- -><- | --TybLhxa8M7aNoW+V Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: Digital signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.5 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFB+kgMlpK98RSteX8RAhgQAJ0Wf89qykDIkrb7Xrs+NEmZwGjvgACfWo5I kmVpZh9UCj+TqzVjkLXr6/M= =HjZO -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --TybLhxa8M7aNoW+V-- --===============2061857412== Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline _______________________________________________ Gnu-arch-users mailing list Gnu-arch-users@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnu-arch-users GNU arch home page: http://savannah.gnu.org/projects/gnu-arch/ --===============2061857412==--