Received: from spf5.us4.outblaze.com (spf5.us4.outblaze.com [205.158.62.27]) by sdf.lonestar.org (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id i9H4cW3U011831 for ; Sun, 17 Oct 2004 04:38:33 GMT Received: from lists.gnu.org (lists.gnu.org [199.232.76.165]) by spf5.us4.outblaze.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A1B6876E99 for ; Sun, 17 Oct 2004 04:38:32 +0000 (GMT) Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.33) id 1CJ2vg-0004RI-Qe for migo@homemail.com; Sun, 17 Oct 2004 00:46:00 -0400 Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.33) id 1CJ2vN-0004RB-1W for gnu-arch-users@gnu.org; Sun, 17 Oct 2004 00:45:41 -0400 Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.33) id 1CJ2vM-0004Qz-LU for gnu-arch-users@gnu.org; Sun, 17 Oct 2004 00:45:40 -0400 Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.33) id 1CJ2vM-0004Qw-JF for gnu-arch-users@gnu.org; Sun, 17 Oct 2004 00:45:40 -0400 Received: from [209.158.45.74] (helo=linuxguru.net) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.34) id 1CJ2o5-0002Z2-0k for gnu-arch-users@gnu.org; Sun, 17 Oct 2004 00:38:09 -0400 Received: by linuxguru.net (Postfix, from userid 10) id 66CF43B4027; Sun, 17 Oct 2004 00:38:08 -0400 (EDT) Received: by comet.merconline.com (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 578F74AB3B; Sun, 17 Oct 2004 00:37:34 -0400 (EDT) To: gnu-arch-users@gnu.org Subject: Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: sharing local archive problems In-Reply-To: <416DF081.2040902@cfconsulting.ca> References: <20041012085047.GB15654@avorop.local> <20041012141819.BDD55127336@comet.merconline.com> <416D492E.2060400@cfconsulting.ca> <20041014010321.GF28371@patrick.wattle.id.au> <416DF081.2040902@cfconsulting.ca> Mail-Folloup-To: never Mail-Copies-To: never Date: Sun, 17 Oct 2004 00:37:34 -0400 Message-Id: <20041017043734.578F74AB3B@comet.merconline.com> From: jblack@merconline.com (James Blackwell) X-BeenThere: gnu-arch-users@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: a discussion list for all things arch-ish List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: gnu-arch-users-bounces+migo=homemail.com@gnu.org Errors-To: gnu-arch-users-bounces+migo=homemail.com@gnu.org Status: RO Content-Length: 1008 Lines: 30 Colin Fox: >|>Another advantage to a shared group is that you can remove people from >|>the group, whereas if you have a shared key, and you don't want someone >|>to have access any more, you'd have to re-key & reissue the key (and >|>make sure you remember where all those keys are used!). >| >| >| Not true. You could just remove one person's key from the >| authorized_keys file. > > So, then is there some advantage to one technique over the other? A > developer group vs a shared account with authorized keys? Whether or not you have to play the permissions/umask dance. -- James Blackwell Try something fun: For the next 24 hours, give Smile more! each person you meet a compliment! GnuPG (ID 06357400) AAE4 8C76 58DA 5902 761D 247A 8A55 DA73 0635 7400 _______________________________________________ Gnu-arch-users mailing list Gnu-arch-users@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnu-arch-users GNU arch home page: http://savannah.gnu.org/projects/gnu-arch/