Received: from spf1.us4.outblaze.com (spf1.us4.outblaze.com [205.158.62.23]) by sdf.lonestar.org (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id j0PLiQIa003035 for ; Tue, 25 Jan 2005 21:44:27 GMT Received: from lists.gnu.org (lists.gnu.org [199.232.76.165]) by spf1.us4.outblaze.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1718B2984D6 for ; Tue, 25 Jan 2005 21:44:59 +0000 (GMT) Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1CtYgu-0008VI-8z for migo@homemail.com; Tue, 25 Jan 2005 16:57:40 -0500 Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1CtYea-0007jD-AA for gnu-arch-users@gnu.org; Tue, 25 Jan 2005 16:55:17 -0500 Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1CtYeX-0007hm-Pi for gnu-arch-users@gnu.org; Tue, 25 Jan 2005 16:55:14 -0500 Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1CtYeX-0007hj-Ll for gnu-arch-users@gnu.org; Tue, 25 Jan 2005 16:55:13 -0500 Received: from [207.115.63.77] (helo=pimout1-ext.prodigy.net) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.34) id 1CtYRw-0007wH-QA for gnu-arch-users@gnu.org; Tue, 25 Jan 2005 16:42:12 -0500 Received: from enroll02.prodigy.net (enroll02-ext.prodigy.net [207.115.61.26]) by pimout1-ext.prodigy.net (8.12.10 milter /8.12.10) with SMTP id j0PLfxGR197398; Tue, 25 Jan 2005 16:42:05 -0500 To: "John A Meinel" , "Milan Cvetkovic" Message-Id: Date: Tue, 25 Jan 2005 16:41:59 -0500 From: "Robert Anderson" Subject: Re: [Gnu-arch-users] tla 1.4 Cc: gnu-arch-users@gnu.org, Andy Tai , Jan Hudec X-BeenThere: gnu-arch-users@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: a discussion list for all things arch-ish List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: gnu-arch-users-bounces+migo=homemail.com@gnu.org Errors-To: gnu-arch-users-bounces+migo=homemail.com@gnu.org Status: RO Content-Length: 632 Lines: 23 We had a roundup tracker a long time ago - I set it up and ran it for awhile until a server crash took it out. It was ok but not great. It had some confusing and/or inoperable features. It had some weird, apparently non-orthogonal categorization schemes (for example "critical", "urgent", or "bug". Critical and urgent aren't bugs?). With customization it could be nice, but I found it non-intuitive. Bob _______________________________________________ Gnu-arch-users mailing list Gnu-arch-users@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnu-arch-users GNU arch home page: http://savannah.gnu.org/projects/gnu-arch/