Received: from spf5.us4.outblaze.com (spf5.us4.outblaze.com [205.158.62.27]) by sdf.lonestar.org (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id j0PDNhJQ029320 for ; Tue, 25 Jan 2005 13:23:43 GMT Received: from lists.gnu.org (lists.gnu.org [199.232.76.165]) by spf5.us4.outblaze.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5173776FD4 for ; Tue, 25 Jan 2005 13:24:10 +0000 (GMT) Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1CtQry-0007Rx-05 for migo@homemail.com; Tue, 25 Jan 2005 08:36:34 -0500 Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1CtQpw-0006x6-NI for gnu-arch-users@gnu.org; Tue, 25 Jan 2005 08:34:29 -0500 Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1CtQpq-0006ub-Ok for gnu-arch-users@gnu.org; Tue, 25 Jan 2005 08:34:23 -0500 Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1CtQpo-0006jG-Q2 for gnu-arch-users@gnu.org; Tue, 25 Jan 2005 08:34:22 -0500 Received: from [206.190.38.128] (helo=web50908.mail.yahoo.com) by monty-python.gnu.org with smtp (Exim 4.34) id 1CtQOK-0007dh-Fd for gnu-arch-users@gnu.org; Tue, 25 Jan 2005 08:05:56 -0500 Received: (qmail 39405 invoked by uid 60001); 25 Jan 2005 13:05:56 -0000 Message-ID: <20050125130555.39403.qmail@web50908.mail.yahoo.com> Received: from [218.18.236.173] by web50908.mail.yahoo.com via HTTP; Tue, 25 Jan 2005 05:05:55 PST X-RocketYMMF: lichengtai Date: Tue, 25 Jan 2005 05:05:55 -0800 (PST) From: Andy Tai Subject: Re: [Gnu-arch-users] tla 1.4 To: Matthew Dempsky , gnu-arch-users@gnu.org In-Reply-To: <87ekga3in6.fsf@flame.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: X-BeenThere: gnu-arch-users@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: atai@gnu.org List-Id: a discussion list for all things arch-ish List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: gnu-arch-users-bounces+migo=homemail.com@gnu.org Errors-To: gnu-arch-users-bounces+migo=homemail.com@gnu.org Status: RO Content-Length: 965 Lines: 32 Using savannah would be good, or maybe baz's bug tracker can also be shared with tla? In any case, both are better than having no bug tracker at all. Arch is in competition with Subversion, and having no bug tracker does not look good... --- Matthew Dempsky wrote: > Baz uses bugzilla at > bugzilla.ubuntu.com, but > at the moment tla doesn't have any bug tracking > that's actively used. > > Since the infrastructure is already there, I'm > tempted to simply > resume using the savannah bug tracker for now until > a better > alternative is actually available. Any objections? ===== Andy Tai, atai@atai.org Free Software: the software by the people, of the people and for the people! Develop! Share! Enhance! Enjoy! _______________________________________________ Gnu-arch-users mailing list Gnu-arch-users@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnu-arch-users GNU arch home page: http://savannah.gnu.org/projects/gnu-arch/