Received: from spf3.us4.outblaze.com (spf3.us4.outblaze.com [205.158.62.25]) by sdf.lonestar.org (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id j0OGPDRv010960 for ; Mon, 24 Jan 2005 16:25:13 GMT Received: from lists.gnu.org (lists.gnu.org [199.232.76.165]) by spf3.us4.outblaze.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 072B053718 for ; Mon, 24 Jan 2005 16:25:42 +0000 (GMT) Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Ct7DW-00087B-L6 for migo@homemail.com; Mon, 24 Jan 2005 11:37:30 -0500 Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1Ct7CQ-00085g-TN for gnu-arch-users@gnu.org; Mon, 24 Jan 2005 11:36:24 -0500 Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1Ct7CQ-00085N-1D for gnu-arch-users@gnu.org; Mon, 24 Jan 2005 11:36:22 -0500 Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Ct7CP-00085K-T0 for gnu-arch-users@gnu.org; Mon, 24 Jan 2005 11:36:21 -0500 Received: from [204.152.189.135] (helo=kechara.flame.org) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (TLSv1:DES-CBC3-SHA:168) (Exim 4.34) id 1Ct6t0-0002T6-K7 for gnu-arch-users@gnu.org; Mon, 24 Jan 2005 11:16:18 -0500 Received: (qmail 2664 invoked by uid 323); 24 Jan 2005 16:16:17 -0000 To: gnu-arch-users@gnu.org Mail-Followup-To: gnu-arch-users@gnu.org Subject: Re: [Gnu-arch-users] tla 1.4 References: <20050122054633.GA23059@benfinney.id.au> <1106379012.9473.7.camel@localhost> From: Matthew Dempsky Date: Mon, 24 Jan 2005 10:18:37 -0600 In-Reply-To: <1106379012.9473.7.camel@localhost> (Bart Teeuwisse's message of "Fri, 21 Jan 2005 23:30:12 -0800") Message-ID: <87ekga3in6.fsf@flame.org> User-Agent: Gnus/5.1007 (Gnus v5.10.7) Emacs/21.3 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-BeenThere: gnu-arch-users@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: a discussion list for all things arch-ish List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: gnu-arch-users-bounces+migo=homemail.com@gnu.org Errors-To: gnu-arch-users-bounces+migo=homemail.com@gnu.org Status: RO Content-Length: 1437 Lines: 38 Bart Teeuwisse writes: > On Sat, 2005-01-22 at 16:46 +1100, Ben Finney wrote: > >> It's probably better to submit these to the bug tracker: >> >> > > Does anyone manage this bug tracker? Considering that the bug tracker > has open bugs filed about 2 years ago I doubt its relevance. Like Aaron said in another thread, that tracker predates bug goo which itself is now defunct. Baz uses bugzilla at bugzilla.ubuntu.com, but at the moment tla doesn't have any bug tracking that's actively used. Since the infrastructure is already there, I'm tempted to simply resume using the savannah bug tracker for now until a better alternative is actually available. Any objections? > Which questions the status of tla 1.x, especially now that baz is > receiving so much development. > > Tom, could you share your thoughts about tla in relation to alternate > GNU Arch implementations such as baz? I'm in particular concerned about > compatibility between available GNU Arch implementations. Tom would likely respond that baz is a development branch of GNU arch. Compatibility shouldn't be a problem, especially as tla catches up with baz. _______________________________________________ Gnu-arch-users mailing list Gnu-arch-users@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnu-arch-users GNU arch home page: http://savannah.gnu.org/projects/gnu-arch/