Received: from spf5.us4.outblaze.com (spf5.us4.outblaze.com [205.158.62.27]) by sdf.lonestar.org (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id j0O0LD31001657 for ; Mon, 24 Jan 2005 00:21:14 GMT Received: from lists.gnu.org (lists.gnu.org [199.232.76.165]) by spf5.us4.outblaze.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C347676F38 for ; Mon, 24 Jan 2005 00:21:43 +0000 (GMT) Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1CssBO-0001x5-FE for migo@homemail.com; Sun, 23 Jan 2005 19:34:18 -0500 Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1Css80-0001K8-IW for gnu-arch-users@gnu.org; Sun, 23 Jan 2005 19:30:49 -0500 Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1Css7p-0001CM-H8 for gnu-arch-users@gnu.org; Sun, 23 Jan 2005 19:30:46 -0500 Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Css7m-00016a-2H for gnu-arch-users@gnu.org; Sun, 23 Jan 2005 19:30:36 -0500 Received: from [66.93.216.237] (helo=defaultvalue.org) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.34) id 1CsrnE-00012h-7D for gnu-arch-users@gnu.org; Sun, 23 Jan 2005 19:09:20 -0500 Received: from trouble.defaultvalue.org (omen.defaultvalue.org [192.168.1.1]) by defaultvalue.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 619B34045; Sun, 23 Jan 2005 18:09:19 -0600 (CST) Received: by trouble.defaultvalue.org (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 1D00C3C101A; Sun, 23 Jan 2005 18:09:20 -0600 (CST) To: Bruce Stephens Subject: Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Is a tagged revision independent of the source? References: <87brcnqke6.fsf@trouble.defaultvalue.org> <873bxzm0xo.fsf@flame.org> <87k6q4av81.fsf@trouble.defaultvalue.org> <20050123191035.GA750@iup.edu> <87brbf3hbq.fsf@trouble.defaultvalue.org> <87acqzyc1r.fsf@cenderis.demon.co.uk> From: Rob Browning Date: Sun, 23 Jan 2005 18:09:20 -0600 In-Reply-To: <87acqzyc1r.fsf@cenderis.demon.co.uk> (Bruce Stephens's message of "Sun, 23 Jan 2005 23:13:04 +0000") Message-ID: <87zmyzzo0f.fsf@trouble.defaultvalue.org> User-Agent: Gnus/5.1007 (Gnus v5.10.7) Emacs/21.3 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: gnu-arch-users@gnu.org X-BeenThere: gnu-arch-users@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: a discussion list for all things arch-ish List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: gnu-arch-users-bounces+migo=homemail.com@gnu.org Errors-To: gnu-arch-users-bounces+migo=homemail.com@gnu.org Status: RO Content-Length: 891 Lines: 24 Bruce Stephens writes: > You may find that some things still don't work. For example, it used > to be that "tla ancestry" insisted on contacting all the archives > (even if all the patch-logs happened to be present locally); that may > have been fixed. (It may also not be of interest to you; the > fundamental operations like "get" will work.) OK, thanks again. Overall, I just wanted to understand any risks associated with ancestral archives "going away" for whatever reason. -- Rob Browning rlb @defaultvalue.org and @debian.org; previously @cs.utexas.edu GPG starting 2002-11-03 = 14DD 432F AE39 534D B592 F9A0 25C8 D377 8C7E 73A4 _______________________________________________ Gnu-arch-users mailing list Gnu-arch-users@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnu-arch-users GNU arch home page: http://savannah.gnu.org/projects/gnu-arch/