Received: from spf1.us4.outblaze.com (spf1.us4.outblaze.com [205.158.62.23]) by sdf.lonestar.org (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id j0NMqHJS020539 for ; Sun, 23 Jan 2005 22:52:17 GMT Received: from lists.gnu.org (lists.gnu.org [199.232.76.165]) by spf1.us4.outblaze.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A7AD229801A for ; Sun, 23 Jan 2005 22:52:47 +0000 (GMT) Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1CsqnK-0002OS-9N for migo@homemail.com; Sun, 23 Jan 2005 18:05:22 -0500 Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1CsqkZ-0001dQ-Jk for gnu-arch-users@gnu.org; Sun, 23 Jan 2005 18:02:32 -0500 Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1CsqkL-0001XE-Hl for gnu-arch-users@gnu.org; Sun, 23 Jan 2005 18:02:19 -0500 Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1CsqkL-0001Sj-2i for gnu-arch-users@gnu.org; Sun, 23 Jan 2005 18:02:17 -0500 Received: from [66.93.216.237] (helo=defaultvalue.org) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.34) id 1CsqJk-0002Ud-DC for gnu-arch-users@gnu.org; Sun, 23 Jan 2005 17:34:48 -0500 Received: from trouble.defaultvalue.org (omen.defaultvalue.org [192.168.1.1]) by defaultvalue.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 924C74045 for ; Sun, 23 Jan 2005 16:34:47 -0600 (CST) Received: by trouble.defaultvalue.org (Postfix, from userid 1000) id B92223C101A; Sun, 23 Jan 2005 16:34:49 -0600 (CST) To: gnu-arch-users@gnu.org Subject: Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Is a tagged revision independent of the source? References: <87brcnqke6.fsf@trouble.defaultvalue.org> <873bxzm0xo.fsf@flame.org> <87k6q4av81.fsf@trouble.defaultvalue.org> <20050123191035.GA750@iup.edu> From: Rob Browning Date: Sun, 23 Jan 2005 16:34:49 -0600 In-Reply-To: <20050123191035.GA750@iup.edu> (Jason McCarty's message of "Sun, 23 Jan 2005 14:10:35 -0500") Message-ID: <87brbf3hbq.fsf@trouble.defaultvalue.org> User-Agent: Gnus/5.1007 (Gnus v5.10.7) Emacs/21.3 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-BeenThere: gnu-arch-users@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: a discussion list for all things arch-ish List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: gnu-arch-users-bounces+migo=homemail.com@gnu.org Errors-To: gnu-arch-users-bounces+migo=homemail.com@gnu.org Status: RO Content-Length: 891 Lines: 27 Jason McCarty writes: > Rob Browning wrote: >> So if you have archive-1 and you tag from that into archive-2, and >> then later archive-1 goes away, will someone who just wants to do a >> "tla get" from archive-2 to get the latest code still be able to, or >> will their get fail because it needs access to archive-1 for the >> oldest revisions? > > By default, tla makes a cacherev when you tag across archives, so any > get from archive-2 should succeed. OK, thanks. I think I understand now. -- Rob Browning rlb @defaultvalue.org and @debian.org; previously @cs.utexas.edu GPG starting 2002-11-03 = 14DD 432F AE39 534D B592 F9A0 25C8 D377 8C7E 73A4 _______________________________________________ Gnu-arch-users mailing list Gnu-arch-users@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnu-arch-users GNU arch home page: http://savannah.gnu.org/projects/gnu-arch/