Received: from spf3.us4.outblaze.com (spf3.us4.outblaze.com [205.158.62.25]) by sdf.lonestar.org (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id j0NIIvcf001123 for ; Sun, 23 Jan 2005 18:18:58 GMT Received: from lists.gnu.org (lists.gnu.org [199.232.76.165]) by spf3.us4.outblaze.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 381D353710 for ; Sun, 23 Jan 2005 18:19:22 +0000 (GMT) Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1CsmWT-0008Ms-Sf for migo@homemail.com; Sun, 23 Jan 2005 13:31:42 -0500 Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1CsmUQ-0007gZ-1U for gnu-arch-users@gnu.org; Sun, 23 Jan 2005 13:29:34 -0500 Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1CsmUF-0007cA-Ea for gnu-arch-users@gnu.org; Sun, 23 Jan 2005 13:29:23 -0500 Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1CsmUF-0007XJ-8h for gnu-arch-users@gnu.org; Sun, 23 Jan 2005 13:29:23 -0500 Received: from [66.93.216.237] (helo=defaultvalue.org) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.34) id 1Csluo-00082Y-Bk for gnu-arch-users@gnu.org; Sun, 23 Jan 2005 12:52:46 -0500 Received: from trouble.defaultvalue.org (omen.defaultvalue.org [192.168.1.1]) by defaultvalue.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B2CE64045 for ; Sun, 23 Jan 2005 11:52:44 -0600 (CST) Received: by trouble.defaultvalue.org (Postfix, from userid 1000) id B6FE03C101A; Sun, 23 Jan 2005 11:52:46 -0600 (CST) To: gnu-arch-users@gnu.org Subject: Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Is a tagged revision independent of the source? References: <87brcnqke6.fsf@trouble.defaultvalue.org> <873bxzm0xo.fsf@flame.org> From: Rob Browning Date: Sun, 23 Jan 2005 11:52:46 -0600 In-Reply-To: <873bxzm0xo.fsf@flame.org> (Matthew Dempsky's message of "Tue, 21 Dec 2004 22:06:27 -0600") Message-ID: <87k6q4av81.fsf@trouble.defaultvalue.org> User-Agent: Gnus/5.1007 (Gnus v5.10.7) Emacs/21.3 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-BeenThere: gnu-arch-users@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: a discussion list for all things arch-ish List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: gnu-arch-users-bounces+migo=homemail.com@gnu.org Errors-To: gnu-arch-users-bounces+migo=homemail.com@gnu.org Status: RO Content-Length: 1400 Lines: 37 Matthew Dempsky writes: > Rob Browning writes: > >> Just to make sure I understand tag semantics, if I run "tla tag foo >> bar" is bar independent of foo after that? In particular, if the >> archive containing foo goes away, will bar and everything subsequent >> to bar still function correctly? > > They're independant in the same sense that if you write a web site and > include links to another web site, that yours will still function if > the other becomes unavailable for whatever reason. > > You can always keep a mirror of the other archive if you're afraid > that it becomes unavailable, or like was mentioned in another thread, > use 'tla cacherev' on the tagged revision. So if you have archive-1 and you tag from that into archive-2, and then later archive-1 goes away, will someone who just wants to do a "tla get" from archive-2 to get the latest code still be able to, or will their get fail because it needs access to archive-1 for the oldest revisions? Thanks -- Rob Browning rlb @defaultvalue.org and @debian.org; previously @cs.utexas.edu GPG starting 2002-11-03 = 14DD 432F AE39 534D B592 F9A0 25C8 D377 8C7E 73A4 _______________________________________________ Gnu-arch-users mailing list Gnu-arch-users@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnu-arch-users GNU arch home page: http://savannah.gnu.org/projects/gnu-arch/