Received: from spf5.us4.outblaze.com (spf5.us4.outblaze.com [205.158.62.27]) by sdf.lonestar.org (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id j0NGLVvf003178 for ; Sun, 23 Jan 2005 16:21:31 GMT Received: from lists.gnu.org (lists.gnu.org [199.232.76.165]) by spf5.us4.outblaze.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1ED2A76FDC for ; Sun, 23 Jan 2005 16:22:01 +0000 (GMT) Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Cskh6-0002d5-Vy for migo@homemail.com; Sun, 23 Jan 2005 11:34:33 -0500 Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1CskcT-0001Ka-50 for gnu-arch-users@gnu.org; Sun, 23 Jan 2005 11:29:45 -0500 Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1CskcQ-0001KB-6J for gnu-arch-users@gnu.org; Sun, 23 Jan 2005 11:29:42 -0500 Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Cskbb-0000pC-7N for gnu-arch-users@gnu.org; Sun, 23 Jan 2005 11:28:51 -0500 Received: from [192.94.73.21] (helo=sdf.lonestar.org) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.34) id 1Csk3j-0007wY-Op for gnu-arch-users@gnu.org; Sun, 23 Jan 2005 10:53:52 -0500 Received: from sdf.lonestar.org (IDENT:migo@ukato.freeshell.org [192.94.73.7]) by sdf.lonestar.org (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id j0NFrDd7026063 for ; Sun, 23 Jan 2005 15:53:13 GMT Received: (from migo@localhost) by sdf.lonestar.org (8.12.10/8.12.8/Submit) id j0NFrD4F002755 for gnu-arch-users@gnu.org; Sun, 23 Jan 2005 15:53:13 GMT Date: Sun, 23 Jan 2005 15:53:13 +0000 From: Mikhael Goikhman To: Arch Users Subject: Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Bazaar 1.1 Message-ID: <20050123155313.GA17135@ukato> Mail-Followup-To: Arch Users References: <1106125554.26756.4.camel@localhost> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1106125554.26756.4.camel@localhost> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i X-BeenThere: gnu-arch-users@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: a discussion list for all things arch-ish List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: gnu-arch-users-bounces+migo=homemail.com@gnu.org Errors-To: gnu-arch-users-bounces+migo=homemail.com@gnu.org Status: RO Content-Length: 1427 Lines: 41 On 19 Jan 2005 20:05:54 +1100, Robert Collins wrote: > > * 'tree-id' a new command, gives the current tree-patchlevel > (equivalent to 'tla logs -f | tail -n 1'). I suggest to call this command 'tree-revision'. It is more intuitive. A user may confuse 'tree-id' with the arch id of the tree directory. [AFAIR, there were plans to make the root directory arch controlled.] Or he may think that arch computes some unique id for each tree on the disk, or maybe a checksum of all files. If the command prints the fully qualified revision name, then it should be called 'tree-revision' in my opinion. > * 'changes' aka 'what-changed' has been removed, it is replaced by > 'diff' and 'status'. I think that conceptually 'changes' is a better term than 'status' and 'diff' for listing changed files and computing a changeset. But I may feel the pressure from cvs/svn users, so I can live with this. > * 'register-archive' checks archives are accessible in all cases. I would like to have a flag to restore the old functionality when two arguments are given. There are several cases when this is useful. We had a discussion on the -dev list a month ago. Other changes look good to me. Regards, Mikhael. _______________________________________________ Gnu-arch-users mailing list Gnu-arch-users@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnu-arch-users GNU arch home page: http://savannah.gnu.org/projects/gnu-arch/