Received: from spf1.us4.outblaze.com (spf1.us4.outblaze.com [205.158.62.23]) by sdf.lonestar.org (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id j0N4poxd028111 for ; Sun, 23 Jan 2005 04:51:50 GMT Received: from lists.gnu.org (lists.gnu.org [199.232.76.165]) by spf1.us4.outblaze.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5F40C298020 for ; Sun, 23 Jan 2005 04:52:19 +0000 (GMT) Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1CsZvg-0008Nb-5N for migo@homemail.com; Sun, 23 Jan 2005 00:04:52 -0500 Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1CsZuz-0008MV-Ip for gnu-arch-users@gnu.org; Sun, 23 Jan 2005 00:04:09 -0500 Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1CsZr4-00074s-Nw for gnu-arch-users@gnu.org; Sun, 23 Jan 2005 00:00:12 -0500 Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1CsZqy-0006xN-Qy for gnu-arch-users@gnu.org; Sun, 23 Jan 2005 00:00:00 -0500 Received: from [80.91.229.2] (helo=main.gmane.org) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.34) id 1CsZNZ-0003Uj-9D for gnu-arch-users@gnu.org; Sat, 22 Jan 2005 23:29:37 -0500 Received: from list by main.gmane.org with local (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 1CsZNX-0003NS-00 for ; Sun, 23 Jan 2005 05:29:35 +0100 Received: from 203.7.227.188 ([203.7.227.188]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Sun, 23 Jan 2005 05:29:35 +0100 Received: from wildfire by 203.7.227.188 with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Sun, 23 Jan 2005 05:29:35 +0100 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ To: gnu-arch-users@gnu.org From: Anand Kumria Date: Sun, 23 Jan 2005 15:36:36 +1100 Message-ID: References: <20050122054633.GA23059@benfinney.id.au> <1106379012.9473.7.camel@localhost> <20050122095316.GA16381@benfinney.id.au> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: 203.7.227.188 User-Agent: Pan/0.14.2.91 (As She Crawled Across the Table (Debian GNU/Linux)) Subject: [Gnu-arch-users] mail user agent wars was: tla 1.4 X-BeenThere: gnu-arch-users@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: a discussion list for all things arch-ish List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: gnu-arch-users-bounces+migo=homemail.com@gnu.org Errors-To: gnu-arch-users-bounces+migo=homemail.com@gnu.org Status: RO Content-Length: 995 Lines: 20 On Sat, 22 Jan 2005 20:53:16 +1100, Ben Finney wrote: > [Bart, please respect Mail-Followup-To in message headers, instead of > Cc-ing list members needlessly. > Apparently Evolution has a "reply to list" action for this.] > Or, instead of trying to beat up everyone because their mail user agent (MUA) doesn't follow your favourite mail header you could instead follow the standard (RFC2822) and set your 'Reply-To:' to the appropriate address list. Also, keep in mind that both Reply-To and (the pointless) Mail-Follow-Up header convey preferences of the author. MUAs must be free to override them. Anand PS: While applaud you decision to quote URI in <>'s; could you at least follow the recommendations from RFC1738 Appendix A. _______________________________________________ Gnu-arch-users mailing list Gnu-arch-users@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnu-arch-users GNU arch home page: http://savannah.gnu.org/projects/gnu-arch/