Received: from spf3.us4.outblaze.com (spf3.us4.outblaze.com [205.158.62.25])
	by sdf.lonestar.org (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id j0M7jdo7027718
	for <migo@freeshell.org>; Sat, 22 Jan 2005 07:45:39 GMT
Received: from lists.gnu.org (lists.gnu.org [199.232.76.165])
	by spf3.us4.outblaze.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2F05353906
	for <migo@homemail.com>; Sat, 22 Jan 2005 07:46:07 +0000 (GMT)
Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43)
	id 1CsGAH-0006CD-0v
	for migo@homemail.com; Sat, 22 Jan 2005 02:58:37 -0500
Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43)
	id 1CsG9g-00068z-C4
	for gnu-arch-users@gnu.org; Sat, 22 Jan 2005 02:58:00 -0500
Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43)
	id 1CsG9a-00064Z-GU
	for gnu-arch-users@gnu.org; Sat, 22 Jan 2005 02:57:54 -0500
Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1CsG9Z-00060i-UZ
	for gnu-arch-users@gnu.org; Sat, 22 Jan 2005 02:57:54 -0500
Received: from [216.127.133.23] (helo=mail8.mdx.safepages.com)
	by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.34) id 1CsFke-0003jl-I0
	for gnu-arch-users@gnu.org; Sat, 22 Jan 2005 02:32:08 -0500
Received: by mail8.mdx.safepages.com (Postfix, from userid 1012)
	id 5C6431435C5; Sat, 22 Jan 2005 07:32:09 +0000 (GMT)
Received: from 192.168.0.102 (host-66-81-125-177.rev.o1.com [66.81.125.177])
	by mail8.mdx.safepages.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7CE821434F7;
	Sat, 22 Jan 2005 07:31:58 +0000 (GMT)
Subject: Re: [Gnu-arch-users] tla 1.4
From: Bart Teeuwisse <bart.teeuwisse@thecodemill.biz>
To: Ben Finney <ben@benfinney.id.au>
In-Reply-To: <20050122054633.GA23059@benfinney.id.au>
References: <pan.2005.01.22.04.30.04.349368@progsoc.org>
	<20050122054633.GA23059@benfinney.id.au>
Content-Type: text/plain
Organization: the Code Mill
Date: Fri, 21 Jan 2005 23:30:12 -0800
Message-Id: <1106379012.9473.7.camel@localhost>
Mime-Version: 1.0
X-Mailer: Evolution 2.0.2 
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Cc: gnu-arch-users@gnu.org
X-BeenThere: gnu-arch-users@gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: a discussion list for all things arch-ish <gnu-arch-users.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnu-arch-users>,
	<mailto:gnu-arch-users-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/pipermail/gnu-arch-users>
List-Post: <mailto:gnu-arch-users@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gnu-arch-users-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnu-arch-users>,
	<mailto:gnu-arch-users-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Sender: gnu-arch-users-bounces+migo=homemail.com@gnu.org
Errors-To: gnu-arch-users-bounces+migo=homemail.com@gnu.org
Status: RO
Content-Length: 876
Lines: 30
On Sat, 2005-01-22 at 16:46 +1100, Ben Finney wrote:

> It's probably better to submit these to the bug tracker:
> 
>     <http://savannah.gnu.org/bugs/?group=gnu-arch>

Does anyone manage this bug tracker? Considering that the bug tracker
has open bugs filed about 2 years ago I doubt its relevance.

Which questions the status of tla 1.x, especially now that baz is
receiving so much development.

Tom, could you share your thoughts about tla in relation to alternate
GNU Arch implementations such as baz? I'm in particular concerned about
compatibility between available GNU Arch implementations.

Baz developers what are your takes?

-- 
Bart Teeuwisse



_______________________________________________
Gnu-arch-users mailing list
Gnu-arch-users@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnu-arch-users

GNU arch home page:
http://savannah.gnu.org/projects/gnu-arch/