Subject: Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Archive configuration recommendations
From: Bart Teeuwisse <bart.teeuwisse@thecodemill.biz>
To: James Blackwell <jblack@merconline.com>
In-Reply-To: <20050121184435.200FD8146A@comet.merconline.com>
References: <41EEECAD.5070705@cfconsulting.ca>
	<20050121184435.200FD8146A@comet.merconline.com>
Content-Type: text/plain
Organization: the Code Mill
Date: Fri, 21 Jan 2005 11:04:11 -0800
Message-Id: <1106334251.8743.17.camel@localhost>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Cc: gnu-arch-users@gnu.org
Precedence: list
Sender: gnu-arch-users-bounces+migo=homemail.com@gnu.org
Errors-To: gnu-arch-users-bounces+migo=homemail.com@gnu.org
Status: RO
Content-Length: 1107
Lines: 37
On Fri, 2005-01-21 at 13:44 -0500, James Blackwell wrote:

> This differs slightly between tla and baz in interface and subtly in
> backend behavior. You don't specify which one you're using, so I'll tell
> you both. 

Both tla and baz are implementations of GNU Arch, to what extend can
they be interchanged? At the moment baz sees a lot of development where
as tla 1.x progresses at a slower pace. Can one replace tla with baz and
switch back to tla later on if so desired. Or must one chose now and
live with the decision?

> If baz, you start up the original archive. Then get the other members to
> create their own empty archives, and set their default archives. Then,
> each guy will do: 
> 
> 
> For each subdeveloper: 
> Baz
> ---
> baz branch bossarchive/your--proj--0 subarchive/sub--proj--0
> baz get my--proj--0 myproj

Where does my--proj--0 come from? 

-- 
Bart Teeuwisse


_______________________________________________
Gnu-arch-users mailing list
Gnu-arch-users@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnu-arch-users

GNU arch home page:
http://savannah.gnu.org/projects/gnu-arch/