Received: from spf5.us4.outblaze.com (spf5.us4.outblaze.com [205.158.62.27]) by sdf.lonestar.org (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id j0IA1wIK014694 for ; Tue, 18 Jan 2005 10:01:58 GMT Received: from lists.gnu.org (lists.gnu.org [199.232.76.165]) by spf5.us4.outblaze.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0554E76F98 for ; Tue, 18 Jan 2005 10:02:22 +0000 (GMT) Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1CqqFY-0004ci-KN for migo@homemail.com; Tue, 18 Jan 2005 05:06:12 -0500 Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1CqqCA-0004bK-9d for gnu-arch-users@gnu.org; Tue, 18 Jan 2005 05:02:43 -0500 Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1CqqC6-0004aI-Aq for gnu-arch-users@gnu.org; Tue, 18 Jan 2005 05:02:38 -0500 Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1CqqC5-0004YU-9j for gnu-arch-users@gnu.org; Tue, 18 Jan 2005 05:02:37 -0500 Received: from [66.160.135.76] (helo=sipsolutions.net) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (TLSv1:RC4-SHA:128) (Exim 4.34) id 1Cqpx4-0003wO-Lf for gnu-arch-users@gnu.org; Tue, 18 Jan 2005 04:47:06 -0500 Received: from mlt177.math.uni-paderborn.de ([131.234.103.177]) by sipsolutions.net with esmtpsa (TLS-1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA:16) (Exim 4.43) id 1Cqpx0-0006U6-GJ for gnu-arch-users@gnu.org; Tue, 18 Jan 2005 09:47:02 +0000 Message-ID: <41ECDB01.5040809@sipsolutions.net> Date: Tue, 18 Jan 2005 10:46:41 +0100 From: Johannes Berg User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0 (Windows/20041206) X-Accept-Language: de-DE, de, en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: gnu-arch-users@gnu.org Subject: Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: failed inode signature validation... References: <16875.60454.210241.494669@seam101.local> <1106013219.4659.17.camel@localhost> <1106019332.4659.18.camel@localhost> <41EC6707.4030801@panoramicfeedback.com> In-Reply-To: <41EC6707.4030801@panoramicfeedback.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-BeenThere: gnu-arch-users@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: a discussion list for all things arch-ish List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: gnu-arch-users-bounces+migo=homemail.com@gnu.org Errors-To: gnu-arch-users-bounces+migo=homemail.com@gnu.org Status: RO Content-Length: 606 Lines: 21 Aaron Bentley wrote: > > I think a cacherev is a better choice. A cacherev of the last > revision is smaller, is easily moved from one filesystem to another, > and turns into a revlib quickly. Also, he can always take these files (the archive) with him on CD to preserve even more bandwidth and have the full history at home. Then, only new work needs to be transferred. johannes _______________________________________________ Gnu-arch-users mailing list Gnu-arch-users@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnu-arch-users GNU arch home page: http://savannah.gnu.org/projects/gnu-arch/