Received: from spf5.us4.outblaze.com (spf5.us4.outblaze.com [205.158.62.27]) by sdf.lonestar.org (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id j0I0T9eR007340 for ; Tue, 18 Jan 2005 00:29:09 GMT Received: from lists.gnu.org (lists.gnu.org [199.232.76.165]) by spf5.us4.outblaze.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6A63E77014 for ; Tue, 18 Jan 2005 00:29:33 +0000 (GMT) Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1CqhRN-00069m-Q8 for migo@homemail.com; Mon, 17 Jan 2005 19:41:49 -0500 Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1CqhMl-0003wY-TQ for gnu-arch-users@gnu.org; Mon, 17 Jan 2005 19:37:04 -0500 Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1CqhMk-0003vm-54 for gnu-arch-users@gnu.org; Mon, 17 Jan 2005 19:37:02 -0500 Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1CqhK5-0002NO-MX for gnu-arch-users@gnu.org; Mon, 17 Jan 2005 19:34:17 -0500 Received: from [147.171.130.40] (helo=harmonie.imag.fr) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (TLSv1:DES-CBC3-SHA:168) (Exim 4.34) id 1CqggY-0000iY-T8 for gnu-arch-users@gnu.org; Mon, 17 Jan 2005 18:53:27 -0500 Received: from ecrins.imag.fr (ecrins.imag.fr [129.88.43.124]) by harmonie.imag.fr (8.13.2/8.13.2) with ESMTP id j0HNrK5r019054; Tue, 18 Jan 2005 00:53:20 +0100 (CET) Received: from moy by ecrins.imag.fr with local (Exim 3.35 #1) id 1Cqgdu-00050k-00; Tue, 18 Jan 2005 00:50:42 +0100 To: Charles Duffy References: <16875.60454.210241.494669@seam101.local> <1106013219.4659.17.camel@localhost> <1106019332.4659.18.camel@localhost> From: Matthieu Moy Mail-Followup-To: Charles Duffy , gnu-arch-users@gnu.org Date: Tue, 18 Jan 2005 00:50:40 +0100 In-Reply-To: <1106019332.4659.18.camel@localhost> (Charles Duffy's message of "Mon, 17 Jan 2005 21:35:32 -0600") Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.1002 (Gnus v5.10.2) Emacs/21.2 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Greylist: Sender IP whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-1.6 (harmonie.imag.fr [147.171.130.40]); Tue, 18 Jan 2005 00:53:20 +0100 (CET) X-IMAG-MailScanner-Information: Please contact the ISP for more information X-IMAG-MailScanner: Found to be clean X-MailScanner-From: moy@mail-veri.imag.fr Cc: gnu-arch-users@gnu.org Subject: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: failed inode signature validation... X-BeenThere: gnu-arch-users@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: a discussion list for all things arch-ish List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: gnu-arch-users-bounces+migo=homemail.com@gnu.org Errors-To: gnu-arch-users-bounces+migo=homemail.com@gnu.org Status: RO Content-Length: 800 Lines: 24 Charles Duffy writes: > On Mon, 2005-01-17 at 23:41 +0100, Matthieu Moy wrote: >> He mentionned he wanted to save bandwidth, so, the working tree isn't >> sufficient, since the next tla changes/commit/update/... will require >> either a pristine tree of a revision in the library. > > Good point. Yes, then, he does need to have a local mirror of his > archive. (I still see no reason to mirror the revision library). mirror a full revision library is mainly useless, but importing the last revision can be usefull if the archive is really big. -- Matthieu _______________________________________________ Gnu-arch-users mailing list Gnu-arch-users@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnu-arch-users GNU arch home page: http://savannah.gnu.org/projects/gnu-arch/