Received: from spf3.us4.outblaze.com (spf3.us4.outblaze.com [205.158.62.25]) by sdf.lonestar.org (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id j0EKInxE000739 for ; Fri, 14 Jan 2005 20:18:50 GMT Received: from lists.gnu.org (lists.gnu.org [199.232.76.165]) by spf3.us4.outblaze.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 74F6853949 for ; Fri, 14 Jan 2005 20:19:08 +0000 (GMT) Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1CpY6D-00051l-9l for migo@homemail.com; Fri, 14 Jan 2005 15:31:13 -0500 Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1CpY5e-0004xR-66 for gnu-arch-users@gnu.org; Fri, 14 Jan 2005 15:30:38 -0500 Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1CpY5b-0004v3-31 for gnu-arch-users@gnu.org; Fri, 14 Jan 2005 15:30:35 -0500 Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1CpY5a-0004tP-Rv for gnu-arch-users@gnu.org; Fri, 14 Jan 2005 15:30:34 -0500 Received: from [132.204.24.67] (helo=mercure.iro.umontreal.ca) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.34) id 1CpXsD-0002wI-M7 for gnu-arch-users@gnu.org; Fri, 14 Jan 2005 15:16:45 -0500 Received: from hidalgo.iro.umontreal.ca (hidalgo.iro.umontreal.ca [132.204.27.50]) by mercure.iro.umontreal.ca (Postfix) with ESMTP id 663118282B8; Fri, 14 Jan 2005 15:16:45 -0500 (EST) Received: from asado.iro.umontreal.ca (asado.iro.umontreal.ca [132.204.24.84]) by hidalgo.iro.umontreal.ca (Postfix) with ESMTP id 52B362CC027; Fri, 14 Jan 2005 15:16:03 -0500 (EST) Received: by asado.iro.umontreal.ca (Postfix, from userid 20848) id 34F8C4BB55; Fri, 14 Jan 2005 15:16:03 -0500 (EST) Message-ID: To: gnu-arch-users@gnu.org References: From: Stefan Monnier Date: Fri, 14 Jan 2005 15:16:02 -0500 In-Reply-To: (Andrew Wilcox's message of "Fri, 14 Jan 2005 09:51:56 -0500") User-Agent: Gnus/5.11 (Gnus v5.11) Emacs/21.3.50 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-DIRO-MailScanner-Information: Please contact the ISP for more information X-DIRO-MailScanner: Found to be clean X-DIRO-MailScanner-SpamCheck: n'est pas un polluriel, SpamAssassin (score=-4.723, requis 5, AWL 0.18, BAYES_00 -4.90) X-MailScanner-From: monnier@iro.umontreal.ca Subject: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: rapid repair of corrupted revision library? X-BeenThere: gnu-arch-users@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: a discussion list for all things arch-ish List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: gnu-arch-users-bounces+migo=homemail.com@gnu.org Errors-To: gnu-arch-users-bounces+migo=homemail.com@gnu.org Status: RO Content-Length: 691 Lines: 20 > In a tree I had retrieved with "tla get --link", I corrupted my > revision library by using a plain "cp" command removing the linked > file first. I quickly gave up trying to remove the resulting > corrupted revisions one by one. Arguably, you shouldn't have to remove those corrupted revisions yourself. Since tla can detect them when it tries to use them, it ciould just remove them itself and just go on with its work rather than complain and stop. Stefan _______________________________________________ Gnu-arch-users mailing list Gnu-arch-users@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnu-arch-users GNU arch home page: http://savannah.gnu.org/projects/gnu-arch/