Message-ID: <41E52C68.20906@panoramicfeedback.com>
Date: Wed, 12 Jan 2005 08:55:52 -0500
From: Aaron Bentley <abentley@panoramicfeedback.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 0.6 (X11/20040530)
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: John Arbash Meinel <john@arbash-meinel.com>
Subject: Re: [Gnu-arch-users] branch accounting/status tool
References: <AA-1B2242436106219C5AE4A79970BD4CD0-ZZ@www7.prodigy.net>
	<41E4BAF3.2020000@arbash-meinel.com>
In-Reply-To: <41E4BAF3.2020000@arbash-meinel.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Cc: gnu-arch-users@gnu.org, Robert Anderson <RWA@sbcglobal.net>
Precedence: list
Sender: gnu-arch-users-bounces+migo=homemail.com@gnu.org
Errors-To: gnu-arch-users-bounces+migo=homemail.com@gnu.org
Status: RO
Content-Length: 1150
Lines: 39
John Arbash Meinel wrote:
> Robert Anderson wrote:
> 
>> I think a branch accounting tool that does the following would be
>> useful:
>>
>> You specify a version, and it recursively goes through all of
>> your archives, and finds all versions which were branched from
>> it.  For each branch, it figures out if:
>>
>>  
>>
> This seems interesting, but honestly it seems like to be really useful, 
> you need to cross archives somehow.

I'm not sure if "goes through all of your archives" means "goes through 
all archives that you control" or "goes through all archives you have 
registered".

It would, obviously, be very slow to go through all remote archives.

To do it locally, one could use the revision library instead of the 
archive, deriving info from log files.  This is a bit less reliable, but 
probably adequate to the purpose.  And much, much faster.

Aaron
-- 
Aaron Bentley
Director of Technology
Panometrics, Inc.


_______________________________________________
Gnu-arch-users mailing list
Gnu-arch-users@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnu-arch-users

GNU arch home page:
http://savannah.gnu.org/projects/gnu-arch/