Received: from spf5.us4.outblaze.com (spf5.us4.outblaze.com [205.158.62.27]) by sdf.lonestar.org (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id iBM3hiub002851 for ; Wed, 22 Dec 2004 03:43:44 GMT Received: from lists.gnu.org (lists.gnu.org [199.232.76.165]) by spf5.us4.outblaze.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 952A977042 for ; Wed, 22 Dec 2004 03:43:24 +0000 (GMT) Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.33) id 1CgxZp-0001ld-I2 for migo@homemail.com; Tue, 21 Dec 2004 22:54:17 -0500 Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.33) id 1CgxZS-0001lG-Ha for gnu-arch-users@gnu.org; Tue, 21 Dec 2004 22:53:54 -0500 Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.33) id 1CgxZR-0001kj-Jx for gnu-arch-users@gnu.org; Tue, 21 Dec 2004 22:53:53 -0500 Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.33) id 1CgxZR-0001kZ-G1 for gnu-arch-users@gnu.org; Tue, 21 Dec 2004 22:53:53 -0500 Received: from [80.91.229.2] (helo=main.gmane.org) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.34) id 1CgxMP-00014E-O8 for gnu-arch-users@gnu.org; Tue, 21 Dec 2004 22:40:25 -0500 Received: from root by main.gmane.org with local (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 1CgxMN-0001Sk-00 for ; Wed, 22 Dec 2004 04:40:23 +0100 Received: from user-0ccss7l.cable.mindspring.com ([24.206.112.245]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Wed, 22 Dec 2004 04:40:23 +0100 Received: from cduffy by user-0ccss7l.cable.mindspring.com with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Wed, 22 Dec 2004 04:40:23 +0100 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ To: gnu-arch-users@gnu.org From: Charles Duffy Date: Tue, 21 Dec 2004 21:30:15 -0600 Message-ID: References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: user-0ccss7l.cable.mindspring.com User-Agent: Pan/0.14.2.91 (As She Crawled Across the Table (Debian GNU/Linux)) Subject: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: Re: arch performance with large trees X-BeenThere: gnu-arch-users@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: a discussion list for all things arch-ish List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: gnu-arch-users-bounces+migo=homemail.com@gnu.org Errors-To: gnu-arch-users-bounces+migo=homemail.com@gnu.org Status: RO Content-Length: 579 Lines: 8 On Tue, 21 Dec 2004 23:59:06 +0200, Miika Komu wrote: > Thanks for the tips! So, I guess hard linking to revlib is currently the > only way to really speed up tla with large trees? Using reiserfs for your revlibs and working trees would probably help, too -- although I wouldn't keep my archives there, having had some bad (data loss) experiences w/ reiser. _______________________________________________ Gnu-arch-users mailing list Gnu-arch-users@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnu-arch-users GNU arch home page: http://savannah.gnu.org/projects/gnu-arch/