Received: from spf3.us4.outblaze.com (spf3.us4.outblaze.com [205.158.62.25]) by sdf.lonestar.org (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id iBM3Ptub027254 for ; Wed, 22 Dec 2004 03:25:56 GMT Received: from lists.gnu.org (lists.gnu.org [199.232.76.165]) by spf3.us4.outblaze.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 88630538EE for ; Wed, 22 Dec 2004 03:25:36 +0000 (GMT) Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.33) id 1CgxIb-0006Yf-Jh for migo@homemail.com; Tue, 21 Dec 2004 22:36:29 -0500 Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.33) id 1CgxHl-0006HK-Lu for gnu-arch-users@gnu.org; Tue, 21 Dec 2004 22:35:37 -0500 Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.33) id 1CgxHj-0006EU-Vu for gnu-arch-users@gnu.org; Tue, 21 Dec 2004 22:35:36 -0500 Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.33) id 1CgxHj-0006Db-3R for gnu-arch-users@gnu.org; Tue, 21 Dec 2004 22:35:35 -0500 Received: from [66.93.216.237] (helo=defaultvalue.org) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.34) id 1Cgx4g-0004zq-VO for gnu-arch-users@gnu.org; Tue, 21 Dec 2004 22:22:07 -0500 Received: from trouble.defaultvalue.org (omen.defaultvalue.org [192.168.1.1]) by defaultvalue.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 238104013 for ; Tue, 21 Dec 2004 21:22:06 -0600 (CST) Received: by trouble.defaultvalue.org (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 94A694109B; Tue, 21 Dec 2004 21:22:15 -0600 (CST) To: gnu-arch-users@gnu.org Subject: Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Is a tagged revision independent of the source? References: <87brcnqke6.fsf@trouble.defaultvalue.org> <20041222031133.GF3611@wisq.net> From: Rob Browning Date: Tue, 21 Dec 2004 21:22:15 -0600 In-Reply-To: <20041222031133.GF3611@wisq.net> (Adrian Irving-Beer's message of "Tue, 21 Dec 2004 22:11:33 -0500") Message-ID: <87brcnow48.fsf@trouble.defaultvalue.org> User-Agent: Gnus/5.1007 (Gnus v5.10.7) Emacs/21.3 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-BeenThere: gnu-arch-users@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: a discussion list for all things arch-ish List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: gnu-arch-users-bounces+migo=homemail.com@gnu.org Errors-To: gnu-arch-users-bounces+migo=homemail.com@gnu.org Status: RO Content-Length: 828 Lines: 24 Adrian Irving-Beer writes: > Note that tagging across archives automatically[1] creates a cacherev > (and tells you). Since you generally shouldn't remove *parts* of an > archive, that's usually sufficient. OK, thanks. The situation I had in mind was one where you had a branch that you were moving to a new archive (via tag), and where you knew you would never want or need to refer to the revisions in the old archive. -- Rob Browning rlb @defaultvalue.org and @debian.org; previously @cs.utexas.edu GPG starting 2002-11-03 = 14DD 432F AE39 534D B592 F9A0 25C8 D377 8C7E 73A4 _______________________________________________ Gnu-arch-users mailing list Gnu-arch-users@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnu-arch-users GNU arch home page: http://savannah.gnu.org/projects/gnu-arch/