Received: from spf1.us4.outblaze.com (spf1.us4.outblaze.com [205.158.62.23]) by sdf.lonestar.org (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id iBLGL0wq027747 for ; Tue, 21 Dec 2004 16:21:00 GMT Received: from lists.gnu.org (lists.gnu.org [199.232.76.165]) by spf1.us4.outblaze.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C9A4353B0A for ; Tue, 21 Dec 2004 16:20:37 +0000 (GMT) Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.33) id 1Cgmv1-0001HW-PK for migo@homemail.com; Tue, 21 Dec 2004 11:31:27 -0500 Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.33) id 1CgmuX-0001H7-6Y for gnu-arch-users@gnu.org; Tue, 21 Dec 2004 11:30:57 -0500 Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.33) id 1CgmuV-0001G9-KA for gnu-arch-users@gnu.org; Tue, 21 Dec 2004 11:30:55 -0500 Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.33) id 1CgmuV-0001Fh-C3 for gnu-arch-users@gnu.org; Tue, 21 Dec 2004 11:30:55 -0500 Received: from [64.233.184.194] (helo=wproxy.gmail.com) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.34) id 1Cgmjf-00023e-Ec for gnu-arch-users@gnu.org; Tue, 21 Dec 2004 11:19:43 -0500 Received: by wproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id 70so376129wra for ; Tue, 21 Dec 2004 08:19:41 -0800 (PST) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:reply-to:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:references; b=IVGoSyYxCL7U99uhpZITHTL+R4NCqJ+qV4f3EBbUE5LV32WuRqnqDFSm3ajfoFohyAdTiuj420PIbu18QKvKi5H/iLpEUZLlCFqruk5KwpShT4sESrPPoz/SkmgnpZowbJgrfKEgzr+EQ0wapBBeRgueNGWhTUm0rn+W8sxzZVk= Received: by 10.54.24.29 with SMTP id 29mr481712wrx; Tue, 21 Dec 2004 08:19:41 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.54.51.2 with HTTP; Tue, 21 Dec 2004 08:19:41 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: Date: Tue, 21 Dec 2004 11:19:41 -0500 From: Cliff Brake To: Catalin Marinas Subject: Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: arch performance with large trees In-Reply-To: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit References: Cc: gnu-arch-users@gnu.org, Miika Komu X-BeenThere: gnu-arch-users@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: Cliff Brake List-Id: a discussion list for all things arch-ish List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: gnu-arch-users-bounces+migo=homemail.com@gnu.org Errors-To: gnu-arch-users-bounces+migo=homemail.com@gnu.org Status: RO Content-Length: 822 Lines: 28 On Tue, 21 Dec 2004 16:11:07 +0000, Catalin Marinas wrote: > I also use arch for storing the Linux kernel and I'm quite happy with > it. It is, indeed, better to hard-link to the revision library. I > noticed that it gets slow with time so I re-create the tree with > "tla get --link" from time to time. How do you sync your arch repositories w/ the Linux source trees? I am using tla-cvs-sync to track U-boot which works very well. Also, is there an Arch mirror of the kernel source available? Thanks, Cliff -- ======================= Cliff Brake http://bec-systems.com _______________________________________________ Gnu-arch-users mailing list Gnu-arch-users@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnu-arch-users GNU arch home page: http://savannah.gnu.org/projects/gnu-arch/