Received: from spf3.us4.outblaze.com (spf3.us4.outblaze.com [205.158.62.25]) by sdf.lonestar.org (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id iBBIdVce010692 for ; Sat, 11 Dec 2004 18:39:32 GMT Received: from lists.gnu.org (lists.gnu.org [199.232.76.165]) by spf3.us4.outblaze.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D974F53846 for ; Sat, 11 Dec 2004 18:39:31 +0000 (GMT) Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.33) id 1CdCJT-0000Vw-0x for migo@homemail.com; Sat, 11 Dec 2004 13:49:51 -0500 Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.33) id 1CdCIy-0000VZ-Mc for gnu-arch-users@gnu.org; Sat, 11 Dec 2004 13:49:20 -0500 Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.33) id 1CdCIx-0000V2-I6 for gnu-arch-users@gnu.org; Sat, 11 Dec 2004 13:49:19 -0500 Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.33) id 1CdCIx-0000UT-9d for gnu-arch-users@gnu.org; Sat, 11 Dec 2004 13:49:19 -0500 Received: from [64.26.151.4] (helo=cymlink-stage.hgn.ca) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.34) id 1CdC8Q-0004w7-WB for gnu-arch-users@gnu.org; Sat, 11 Dec 2004 13:38:27 -0500 Received: by cymlink-stage.hgn.ca (Postfix, from userid 65534) id A81FE5F777; Sat, 11 Dec 2004 13:38:22 -0500 (EST) Received: from kitson (kitson.wisq.org [192.168.16.1]) by cymlink-stage.hgn.ca (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7339B5F75D; Sat, 11 Dec 2004 13:38:10 -0500 (EST) Received: by kitson (Postfix, from userid 1000) id BA856EFF8; Sat, 11 Dec 2004 13:38:09 -0500 (EST) Date: Sat, 11 Dec 2004 13:38:09 -0500 From: Adrian Irving-Beer To: Anand Kumria , gnu-arch-users@gnu.org Subject: Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: release goals for Bazaar 1.1 Message-ID: <20041211183809.GC3388@wisq.net> Mail-Followup-To: Anand Kumria , gnu-arch-users@gnu.org References: <1102095916.6942.43.camel@localhost> <20041211154916.GA1832@ukato> Mime-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20041211154916.GA1832@ukato> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.6+20040907i Cc: X-BeenThere: gnu-arch-users@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: a discussion list for all things arch-ish List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="===============1383541541==" Sender: gnu-arch-users-bounces+migo=homemail.com@gnu.org Errors-To: gnu-arch-users-bounces+migo=homemail.com@gnu.org Status: RO Content-Length: 1604 Lines: 56 --===============1383541541== Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="zCKi3GIZzVBPywwA" Content-Disposition: inline --zCKi3GIZzVBPywwA Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline On Sat, Dec 11, 2004 at 03:49:16PM +0000, Mikhael Goikhman wrote: > Personally I think that 'annotate' is more intuitive, as in > 'annotate-file-lines'. 'blame' is completely misleading (does it > send email to someone's mom?) Heh, agreed. It skips one step ahead in one possible chain of action, i.e. bug found -> annotate -> fix it -> blame someone (sometimes with the latter two reversed). Frankly, that course of action suggests a pretty dysfunctional and unproductive project crew to me. Subversion probably meant it to be cute. I find it annoyingly cheeky. --zCKi3GIZzVBPywwA Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: Digital signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.5 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFBuz6R8ARHrB3FJfkRAsdgAKCYpVlDiPIx1PYHhxiCPb3tuxzGWQCeK/3f UaXuV9pF6Kgmt51S0TjdnDk= =KGu6 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --zCKi3GIZzVBPywwA-- --===============1383541541== Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline _______________________________________________ Gnu-arch-users mailing list Gnu-arch-users@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnu-arch-users GNU arch home page: http://savannah.gnu.org/projects/gnu-arch/ --===============1383541541==--