Received: from spf5.us4.outblaze.com (spf5.us4.outblaze.com [205.158.62.27]) by sdf.lonestar.org (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id iBADZkgx015854 for ; Fri, 10 Dec 2004 13:35:48 GMT Received: from lists.gnu.org (lists.gnu.org [199.232.76.165]) by spf5.us4.outblaze.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1410976EF2 for ; Fri, 10 Dec 2004 13:35:47 +0000 (GMT) Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.33) id 1Ccl5t-0006rb-St for migo@homemail.com; Fri, 10 Dec 2004 08:46:01 -0500 Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.33) id 1Ccl5X-0006rG-Vp for gnu-arch-users@gnu.org; Fri, 10 Dec 2004 08:45:40 -0500 Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.33) id 1Ccl5X-0006qr-7f for gnu-arch-users@gnu.org; Fri, 10 Dec 2004 08:45:39 -0500 Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.33) id 1Ccl5X-0006qo-4t for gnu-arch-users@gnu.org; Fri, 10 Dec 2004 08:45:39 -0500 Received: from [195.27.129.236] (helo=mailsc1.simcon-mt.com) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.34) id 1Cckut-0001c8-7O for gnu-arch-users@gnu.org; Fri, 10 Dec 2004 08:34:40 -0500 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mailsc1.simcon-mt.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5FF9B3247F; Fri, 10 Dec 2004 14:34:22 +0100 (CET) Received: from localhost (localhost.local [127.0.0.1]) by gate.local (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1827BF945; Fri, 10 Dec 2004 14:34:21 +0100 (CET) Received: by avorop.local (Postfix, from userid 1000) id A04DF16806E; Fri, 10 Dec 2004 14:41:28 +0100 (CET) Date: Fri, 10 Dec 2004 14:41:28 +0100 From: "Andrei A. Voropaev" To: mlh@zipworld.com.au Subject: Re: [Gnu-arch-users] changes: tree shows no revisions in version ? Message-ID: <20041210134128.GB26270@avorop.local> Mail-Followup-To: mlh@zipworld.com.au, gnu-arch-users@gnu.org References: <20041209112712.GA24012@avorop.local> <41B85203.9080908@arbash-meinel.com> <20041209143322.GE24012@avorop.local> <20041209143435.GB3760@patrick.wattle.id.au> <20041209151234.GF24012@avorop.local> <41B86B94.3040907@panoramicfeedback.com> <20041209155621.GG24012@avorop.local> <41B87C08.10600@q-voz.com> <20041210061933.GA22662@zipworld.com.au> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20041210061933.GA22662@zipworld.com.au> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.1i X-Virus-Scanned: by (amavisd-new) at local gate Cc: gnu-arch-users@gnu.org X-BeenThere: gnu-arch-users@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: a discussion list for all things arch-ish List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: gnu-arch-users-bounces+migo=homemail.com@gnu.org Errors-To: gnu-arch-users-bounces+migo=homemail.com@gnu.org Status: RO Content-Length: 1237 Lines: 38 On Fri, Dec 10, 2004 at 05:19:33PM +1100, mlh@zipworld.com.au wrote: > On Thu, Dec 09, 2004 at 10:23:36AM -0600, Gustavo C??rdova Avila wrote: > > Andrei A. Voropaev wrote: > > > > >Well. It took me quite a few tries before I've figured this out. If > > >assigning different name to archive is so dangerous, then why is it > > >allowed? And if it is allowed, then why later usage of alternative name > > >leads to problems? > > > > > >Andrei > > > > > Well, for one thing, you might know just what you're doing, > > .. > > > the problem is not that you can or cannot do it, the problem > seems to be that some arch tutorial out there has this as an > example. > > irc was full of people having these problems a little while back > but sorry, i can't remember the where the problematical tutorial was. Did I understand it correctly that the section http://regexps.srparish.net/www/tutorial/html/shared-and-public-archives.html should be changed so that tla register-archive does not specify explicit name? Andrei _______________________________________________ Gnu-arch-users mailing list Gnu-arch-users@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnu-arch-users GNU arch home page: http://savannah.gnu.org/projects/gnu-arch/