From: mlh@zipworld.com.au
Date: Fri, 10 Dec 2004 17:19:33 +1100
To: Gustavo C??rdova Avila <gustavo.cordova@q-voz.com>
Subject: Re: [Gnu-arch-users] changes: tree shows no revisions in version ?
Message-ID: <20041210061933.GA22662@zipworld.com.au>
References: <20041209112712.GA24012@avorop.local>
	<41B85203.9080908@arbash-meinel.com>
	<20041209143322.GE24012@avorop.local>
	<20041209143435.GB3760@patrick.wattle.id.au>
	<20041209151234.GF24012@avorop.local>
	<41B86B94.3040907@panoramicfeedback.com>
	<20041209155621.GG24012@avorop.local> <41B87C08.10600@q-voz.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <41B87C08.10600@q-voz.com>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.28i
Cc: gnu-arch-users@gnu.org
Precedence: list
Sender: gnu-arch-users-bounces+migo=homemail.com@gnu.org
Errors-To: gnu-arch-users-bounces+migo=homemail.com@gnu.org
Status: RO
Content-Length: 921
Lines: 34
On Thu, Dec 09, 2004 at 10:23:36AM -0600, Gustavo C??rdova Avila wrote:
> Andrei A. Voropaev wrote:
> 
> >Well. It took me quite a few tries before I've figured this out. If
> >assigning different name to archive is so dangerous, then why is it
> >allowed? And if it is allowed, then why later usage of alternative name
> >leads to problems?
> >
> >Andrei
> >
> Well, for one thing, you might know just what you're doing,

..


the problem is not that you can or cannot do it, the problem
seems to be that some arch tutorial out there has this as an
example.

irc was full of people having these problems a little while back
but sorry, i can't remember the where the problematical tutorial was.


Matt


_______________________________________________
Gnu-arch-users mailing list
Gnu-arch-users@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnu-arch-users

GNU arch home page:
http://savannah.gnu.org/projects/gnu-arch/