Received: from spf5.us4.outblaze.com (spf5.us4.outblaze.com [205.158.62.27]) by sdf.lonestar.org (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id iB9G6ifk006469 for ; Thu, 9 Dec 2004 16:06:45 GMT Received: from lists.gnu.org (lists.gnu.org [199.232.76.165]) by spf5.us4.outblaze.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0D8B777151 for ; Thu, 9 Dec 2004 16:06:40 +0000 (GMT) Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.33) id 1CcQiP-0004Mx-P7 for migo@homemail.com; Thu, 09 Dec 2004 11:00:25 -0500 Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.33) id 1CcQhw-0004Md-8B for gnu-arch-users@gnu.org; Thu, 09 Dec 2004 10:59:56 -0500 Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.33) id 1CcQhv-0004M6-BL for gnu-arch-users@gnu.org; Thu, 09 Dec 2004 10:59:55 -0500 Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.33) id 1CcQhv-0004M3-3m for gnu-arch-users@gnu.org; Thu, 09 Dec 2004 10:59:55 -0500 Received: from [195.27.129.236] (helo=mailsc1.simcon-mt.com) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.34) id 1CcQXk-0008TG-1D for gnu-arch-users@gnu.org; Thu, 09 Dec 2004 10:49:24 -0500 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mailsc1.simcon-mt.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 07B3F3247F; Thu, 9 Dec 2004 16:49:19 +0100 (CET) Received: from localhost (localhost.local [127.0.0.1]) by gate.local (Postfix) with ESMTP id B87D7F905; Thu, 9 Dec 2004 16:49:17 +0100 (CET) Received: by avorop.local (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 4657516806E; Thu, 9 Dec 2004 16:56:21 +0100 (CET) Date: Thu, 9 Dec 2004 16:56:21 +0100 From: "Andrei A. Voropaev" To: Aaron Bentley Subject: Re: [Gnu-arch-users] changes: tree shows no revisions in version ? Message-ID: <20041209155621.GG24012@avorop.local> Mail-Followup-To: Aaron Bentley , gnu-arch-users@gnu.org References: <20041209112712.GA24012@avorop.local> <41B85203.9080908@arbash-meinel.com> <20041209143322.GE24012@avorop.local> <20041209143435.GB3760@patrick.wattle.id.au> <20041209151234.GF24012@avorop.local> <41B86B94.3040907@panoramicfeedback.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <41B86B94.3040907@panoramicfeedback.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.1i X-Virus-Scanned: by (amavisd-new) at local gate Cc: gnu-arch-users@gnu.org X-BeenThere: gnu-arch-users@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: a discussion list for all things arch-ish List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: gnu-arch-users-bounces+migo=homemail.com@gnu.org Errors-To: gnu-arch-users-bounces+migo=homemail.com@gnu.org Status: RO Content-Length: 827 Lines: 23 On Thu, Dec 09, 2004 at 10:13:24AM -0500, Aaron Bentley wrote: > Andrei A. Voropaev wrote: > >Since both of us are learning, he might have registered the same archive > >under 2 different names and then checked out his copy under false name. > > The simple way to avoid this problem is to omit the archive name when > you register the archive, and let tla autodetect it. Well. It took me quite a few tries before I've figured this out. If assigning different name to archive is so dangerous, then why is it allowed? And if it is allowed, then why later usage of alternative name leads to problems? Andrei _______________________________________________ Gnu-arch-users mailing list Gnu-arch-users@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnu-arch-users GNU arch home page: http://savannah.gnu.org/projects/gnu-arch/