Received: from spf1.us4.outblaze.com (spf1.us4.outblaze.com [205.158.62.23]) by sdf.lonestar.org (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id iB9F63jh011548 for ; Thu, 9 Dec 2004 15:06:03 GMT Received: from lists.gnu.org (lists.gnu.org [199.232.76.165]) by spf1.us4.outblaze.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B17C6536B9 for ; Thu, 9 Dec 2004 15:06:02 +0000 (GMT) Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.33) id 1CcQ1g-0007tQ-Q6 for migo@homemail.com; Thu, 09 Dec 2004 10:16:16 -0500 Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.33) id 1CcQ1L-0007sl-PX for gnu-arch-users@gnu.org; Thu, 09 Dec 2004 10:15:55 -0500 Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.33) id 1CcQ1K-0007sP-NI for gnu-arch-users@gnu.org; Thu, 09 Dec 2004 10:15:54 -0500 Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.33) id 1CcQ1K-0007sB-JK for gnu-arch-users@gnu.org; Thu, 09 Dec 2004 10:15:54 -0500 Received: from [195.27.129.236] (helo=mailsc1.simcon-mt.com) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.34) id 1CcPrI-0007eD-VJ for gnu-arch-users@gnu.org; Thu, 09 Dec 2004 10:05:33 -0500 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mailsc1.simcon-mt.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 65F4B3247F for ; Thu, 9 Dec 2004 16:05:32 +0100 (CET) Received: from localhost (localhost.local [127.0.0.1]) by gate.local (Postfix) with ESMTP id 26ABBF905 for ; Thu, 9 Dec 2004 16:05:31 +0100 (CET) Received: by avorop.local (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 8CFD616806E; Thu, 9 Dec 2004 16:12:34 +0100 (CET) Date: Thu, 9 Dec 2004 16:12:34 +0100 From: "Andrei A. Voropaev" To: gnu-arch-users@gnu.org Subject: Re: [Gnu-arch-users] changes: tree shows no revisions in version ? Message-ID: <20041209151234.GF24012@avorop.local> Mail-Followup-To: gnu-arch-users@gnu.org References: <20041209112712.GA24012@avorop.local> <41B85203.9080908@arbash-meinel.com> <20041209143322.GE24012@avorop.local> <20041209143435.GB3760@patrick.wattle.id.au> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20041209143435.GB3760@patrick.wattle.id.au> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.1i X-Virus-Scanned: by (amavisd-new) at local gate X-BeenThere: gnu-arch-users@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: a discussion list for all things arch-ish List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: gnu-arch-users-bounces+migo=homemail.com@gnu.org Errors-To: gnu-arch-users-bounces+migo=homemail.com@gnu.org Status: RO Content-Length: 1315 Lines: 32 On Thu, Dec 09, 2004 at 10:34:35PM +0800, Cameron Patrick wrote: > Andrei A. Voropaev wrote: > > > ++default-version. Can it be the source of the problem? If yes, then can > > I simply change ++default-version to the value preceding patch-log? > > You can. I'm curious as to how it came to be messed up in the first > place, though, as it may cause problems for you later on (e.g. if you > try to commit). My guess is that you registered an archive with a > non-canonical name (i.e. your archive is sm@xxx but you registered it > as av@xxx) and then used the av@xxx archive to get from? If this is > the case, you should un-register the av@xxx archive (tla > register-archive -d) and register it again with the correct archive > name. That's also interesting for me. This is not my tree, but one of my collegue. And I have one suspicion. When I do 'tla archives' under his name I get both sm@xxx and av@xxx pointing to the same archive. Since both of us are learning, he might have registered the same archive under 2 different names and then checked out his copy under false name. Andrei _______________________________________________ Gnu-arch-users mailing list Gnu-arch-users@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnu-arch-users GNU arch home page: http://savannah.gnu.org/projects/gnu-arch/