Received: from spf5.us4.outblaze.com (spf5.us4.outblaze.com [205.158.62.27]) by sdf.lonestar.org (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id iB9C3BsE004917 for ; Thu, 9 Dec 2004 12:03:13 GMT Received: from lists.gnu.org (lists.gnu.org [199.232.76.165]) by spf5.us4.outblaze.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5D36F76EEB for ; Thu, 9 Dec 2004 12:03:10 +0000 (GMT) Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.33) id 1CcNAg-0000Qt-F3 for migo@homemail.com; Thu, 09 Dec 2004 07:13:22 -0500 Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.33) id 1CcNAC-0000QC-TG for gnu-arch-users@gnu.org; Thu, 09 Dec 2004 07:12:53 -0500 Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.33) id 1CcNAB-0000Ph-TD for gnu-arch-users@gnu.org; Thu, 09 Dec 2004 07:12:52 -0500 Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.33) id 1CcNAB-0000Pe-OO for gnu-arch-users@gnu.org; Thu, 09 Dec 2004 07:12:51 -0500 Received: from [68.230.240.27] (helo=lakermmtao12.cox.net) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.34) id 1CcMzs-0002q3-6O for gnu-arch-users@gnu.org; Thu, 09 Dec 2004 07:02:12 -0500 Received: from nonerjsnum1tkq ([68.14.187.181]) by lakermmtao12.cox.net (InterMail vM.6.01.04.00 201-2131-117-20041022) with ESMTP id <20041209120211.UXZ12874.lakermmtao12.cox.net@nonerjsnum1tkq>; Thu, 9 Dec 2004 07:02:11 -0500 From: "Tom Browder" To: "'Charles Duffy'" , Date: Thu, 9 Dec 2004 06:04:04 -0600 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Microsoft Office Outlook, Build 11.0.6353 In-Reply-To: X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.2180 Thread-Index: AcTdVhMQw6k30+G8ToSC/67tikoqjgAj8Bqg Message-Id: <20041209120211.UXZ12874.lakermmtao12.cox.net@nonerjsnum1tkq> Cc: Subject: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: Arch Versus CVS Versus Subversoin X-BeenThere: gnu-arch-users@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: a discussion list for all things arch-ish List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: gnu-arch-users-bounces+migo=homemail.com@gnu.org Errors-To: gnu-arch-users-bounces+migo=homemail.com@gnu.org Status: RO Content-Length: 1377 Lines: 34 > -----Original Message----- > From: gnu-arch-users-bounces+tbrowder=cox.net@gnu.org > [mailto:gnu-arch-users-bounces+tbrowder=cox.net@gnu.org] On > Behalf Of Charles Duffy > Sent: Wednesday, December 08, 2004 12:44 PM > To: gnu-arch-users@gnu.org > Subject: [Gnu-arch-users] RE: Re: Arch Versus CVS Versus Subversoin > > diffs would save considerable space. > Would you mind quantifying that a bit? > How large are the files? How many of them? How many revisions? Um, a typical project has a binary file that grows to about 10 Mb. Snapshots (check ins) are done throughout the day as significant editing is done to the file (mainly for backup and to give a rollback capability in case of errors). A project will typically take 90+ days to complete, each day with several check ins. We have over 120 projects archived (but none of the binary files yet). The way we work around the lack of binary diffs now is the binary file has an ASCII equivalent so we convert to ASCII and check it in. To reconstruct, check out the correct copy and reconvert to binary (a pain, and subject to error). Ideally we could just deal with the binary form. Tom Browder _______________________________________________ Gnu-arch-users mailing list Gnu-arch-users@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnu-arch-users GNU arch home page: http://savannah.gnu.org/projects/gnu-arch/