Received: from spf5.us4.outblaze.com (spf5.us4.outblaze.com [205.158.62.27]) by sdf.lonestar.org (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id iB6LQ7bh029155 for ; Mon, 6 Dec 2004 21:26:09 GMT Received: from lists.gnu.org (lists.gnu.org [199.232.76.165]) by spf5.us4.outblaze.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B5DDD76F94 for ; Mon, 6 Dec 2004 21:26:07 +0000 (GMT) Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.33) id 1CbQWj-0007Cu-9e for migo@homemail.com; Mon, 06 Dec 2004 16:36:13 -0500 Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.33) id 1CbQWI-0007B2-Aa for gnu-arch-users@gnu.org; Mon, 06 Dec 2004 16:35:46 -0500 Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.33) id 1CbQWH-0007AO-NU for gnu-arch-users@gnu.org; Mon, 06 Dec 2004 16:35:45 -0500 Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.33) id 1CbQWH-0007A3-KV for gnu-arch-users@gnu.org; Mon, 06 Dec 2004 16:35:45 -0500 Received: from [66.216.124.41] (helo=server4.panoramicfeedback.com) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (TLSv1:DES-CBC3-SHA:168) (Exim 4.34) id 1CbQLq-0000xq-6j for gnu-arch-users@gnu.org; Mon, 06 Dec 2004 16:24:58 -0500 Received: from panoramicfeedback.com (server4.panoramicfeedback.com [66.216.124.41]) by server4.panoramicfeedback.com (8.12.3/8.12.3/Debian-6.6) with ESMTP id iB6LOsil021869; Mon, 6 Dec 2004 16:24:55 -0500 Message-ID: <41B4CE26.8020204@panoramicfeedback.com> Date: Mon, 06 Dec 2004 16:24:54 -0500 From: Aaron Bentley User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 0.5 (X11/20040309) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Charles Duffy Subject: Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: Arch Versus CVS Versus Subversoin References: <20041205000613.PNEI7152.lakermmtao09.cox.net@nonerjsnum1tkq> <26E1F314-4654-11D9-AD55-000A957659CC@spy.net> <20041205023828.GA11443@suffields.me.uk> <87pt1o9kvb.fsf@tleepslib.sk.tsukuba.ac.jp> <200412061850.iB6IoWmS036469@xl2.seyza.com> <87brd7428y.fsf@deneb.enyo.de> <878y8bjgre.fsf@cenderis.demon.co.uk> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Panometrics-MailScanner: Found to be clean Cc: gnu-arch-users@gnu.org X-BeenThere: gnu-arch-users@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: a discussion list for all things arch-ish List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: gnu-arch-users-bounces+migo=homemail.com@gnu.org Errors-To: gnu-arch-users-bounces+migo=homemail.com@gnu.org Status: RO Content-Length: 732 Lines: 26 Really, I don't understand why this is going on and on. Tom's already proposed a way to support xdelta in the Arch 1.x series: have an optional xdelta changeset for each non-import revision. http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/gnu-arch-users/2004-06/msg00406.html Presumably, anyone who wants to implement xdelta can do it that way. Charles Duffy wrote: > Losing dumb server support seems a bit much to pay for such a generally > unimportant feature. -- Aaron Bentley Director of Technology Panometrics, Inc. _______________________________________________ Gnu-arch-users mailing list Gnu-arch-users@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnu-arch-users GNU arch home page: http://savannah.gnu.org/projects/gnu-arch/