Received: from spf5.us4.outblaze.com (spf5.us4.outblaze.com [205.158.62.27]) by sdf.lonestar.org (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id iB5GCHUJ025755 for ; Sun, 5 Dec 2004 16:12:18 GMT Received: from lists.gnu.org (lists.gnu.org [199.232.76.165]) by spf5.us4.outblaze.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 660B377024 for ; Sun, 5 Dec 2004 16:12:21 +0000 (GMT) Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.33) id 1Caz9T-0007PI-DV for migo@homemail.com; Sun, 05 Dec 2004 11:22:23 -0500 Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.33) id 1Caz8T-00079g-BK for gnu-arch-users@gnu.org; Sun, 05 Dec 2004 11:21:21 -0500 Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.33) id 1Caz8S-00079M-LB for gnu-arch-users@gnu.org; Sun, 05 Dec 2004 11:21:20 -0500 Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.33) id 1Caz8S-00079C-Hu for gnu-arch-users@gnu.org; Sun, 05 Dec 2004 11:21:20 -0500 Received: from [203.22.251.251] (helo=mg2.works.net.au) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (TLSv1:DES-CBC3-SHA:168) (Exim 4.34) id 1CayyW-00086n-O0 for gnu-arch-users@gnu.org; Sun, 05 Dec 2004 11:11:05 -0500 Received: from aardvark.ozdial.net.au (aardvark.ozdial.net.au [203.22.251.121]) by mg2.works.net.au (8.12.11/linuxconf) with ESMTP id iB5GApcM015074; Mon, 6 Dec 2004 03:10:51 +1100 Received: from lifelesswks.robertcollins.net (dsl-253.4.240.220.rns01-kent-syd.dsl.comindico.com.au [220.240.4.253]) by aardvark.ozdial.net.au (8.12.8/linuxconf) with ESMTP id iB5GAnUK019042; Mon, 6 Dec 2004 03:10:50 +1100 Received: from [213.151.107.243] (helo=lifelesslap.robertcollins.net) by lifelesswks.robertcollins.net with asmtp (Exim 4.34) id 1CayyG-0004MF-Es; Mon, 06 Dec 2004 03:10:49 +1100 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] ident=robertc) by lifelesslap.robertcollins.net with esmtp (Exim 4.34) id 1Cayxc-0007Ga-37; Mon, 06 Dec 2004 03:10:08 +1100 Subject: Re: [Gnu-arch-users] [BUG] i18n (Re: Message translation - basic framework) From: Robert Collins To: Tez Kamihira In-Reply-To: <1102190470.6937.18.camel@localhost> References: <20040615.105821.74747648.tez@kamihira.com> <20040819.114448.71097995.tez@kamihira.com> <1102190470.6937.18.camel@localhost> Date: Sun, 05 Dec 2004 22:35:56 +1100 Message-Id: <1102246556.21407.4.camel@localhost> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.0.2 X-MG2-Works-MailScanner-Information: Please contact the ISP for more information X-MG2-Works-MailScanner: Found to be clean X-MG2-Works-MailScanner-SpamCheck: not spam, SpamAssassin (score=-3.866, required 5, BAYES_00 -4.90, DATE_IN_PAST_03_06 0.42, RCVD_IN_NJABL_DUL 0.53, RCVD_IN_SORBS_DUL 0.09) X-MailScanner-From: rbcollins@cygwin.com Cc: Arch Users X-BeenThere: gnu-arch-users@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: a discussion list for all things arch-ish List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="===============0250503347==" Sender: gnu-arch-users-bounces+migo=homemail.com@gnu.org Errors-To: gnu-arch-users-bounces+migo=homemail.com@gnu.org Status: RO Content-Length: 2408 Lines: 78 --===============0250503347== Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="=-Kxm6SJATO6V8G2d11AOL" --=-Kxm6SJATO6V8G2d11AOL Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Sun, 2004-12-05 at 07:01 +1100, Robert Collins wrote: > On Thu, 2004-08-19 at 11:44 +0900, Tez Kamihira wrote: > > A few days ago, some french translator asked me about i18n status of > > GNU arch. Because my previous request went somewhere far away, I > > re-send it to BUG GOO. > >=20 > > On the logical ground, my attempt woundn't be complicated at all, but > > it triggers fairly amount of lines in tla's code, so it's almost > > impossible for me to make another long lived tracking branch from > > tom/jblack's main line and maintain it independently for a long time. >=20 > Hi, I've looked at this and its not (currently) suitable for inclusion. >=20 > It places po data for tla into package-framework, which is wrong : > package-framework is a separate project (think autoconf) to tla. >=20 > The correct way is to put common logic, but not data into > package-framework, and the tla specific data & logic into tla itself. >=20 > I'm going to see if I can hack something up based on your work though. I've integrated your code into baz: robert.collins@canonical.com--general/package-framework--i18n--1.1 robert.collins@canonical.com--general/bazaar--devel--1.1--patch-18 robert.collins@canonical.com--general/bazaar-debian--i18n--1.1 I'll be pushing this into the mainline shortly.=20 Anyone who wants to do translations : they'd be massively appreciated. Cheers, Rob --=-Kxm6SJATO6V8G2d11AOL Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.5 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQBBsvKcM4BfeEKYx2ERAjpoAKCZn7onXYxwiMRdXRaJobovXEVo5ACeJP0X xI55NleDMvLP289kzHBQOXY= =coVK -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-Kxm6SJATO6V8G2d11AOL-- --===============0250503347== Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline _______________________________________________ Gnu-arch-users mailing list Gnu-arch-users@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnu-arch-users GNU arch home page: http://savannah.gnu.org/projects/gnu-arch/ --===============0250503347==--