Received: from spf5.us4.outblaze.com (spf5.us4.outblaze.com [205.158.62.27]) by sdf.lonestar.org (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id iB52dKiQ004570 for ; Sun, 5 Dec 2004 02:39:20 GMT Received: from lists.gnu.org (lists.gnu.org [199.232.76.165]) by spf5.us4.outblaze.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2287476F35 for ; Sun, 5 Dec 2004 02:39:23 +0000 (GMT) Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.33) id 1CamSg-0001jF-NY for migo@homemail.com; Sat, 04 Dec 2004 21:49:22 -0500 Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.33) id 1CamSD-0001iz-Ve for gnu-arch-users@gnu.org; Sat, 04 Dec 2004 21:48:54 -0500 Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.33) id 1CamSD-0001in-Ia for gnu-arch-users@gnu.org; Sat, 04 Dec 2004 21:48:53 -0500 Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.33) id 1CamSD-0001ik-GX for gnu-arch-users@gnu.org; Sat, 04 Dec 2004 21:48:53 -0500 Received: from [83.216.134.182] (helo=cyclone.suffields.me.uk) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.34) id 1CamIT-0003bu-Vs for gnu-arch-users@gnu.org; Sat, 04 Dec 2004 21:38:51 -0500 Received: from asuffield by cyclone.suffields.me.uk with local (Exim 3.36 #1 (Debian)) id 1CamI8-0002zU-00 for ; Sun, 05 Dec 2004 02:38:28 +0000 Date: Sun, 5 Dec 2004 02:38:28 +0000 From: Andrew Suffield To: gnu-arch-users@gnu.org Subject: Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Arch Versus CVS Versus Subversoin Message-ID: <20041205023828.GA11443@suffields.me.uk> Mail-Followup-To: gnu-arch-users@gnu.org References: <20041205000613.PNEI7152.lakermmtao09.cox.net@nonerjsnum1tkq> <26E1F314-4654-11D9-AD55-000A957659CC@spy.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <26E1F314-4654-11D9-AD55-000A957659CC@spy.net> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.6+20040907i X-BeenThere: gnu-arch-users@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: a discussion list for all things arch-ish List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="===============1943784332==" Sender: gnu-arch-users-bounces+migo=homemail.com@gnu.org Errors-To: gnu-arch-users-bounces+migo=homemail.com@gnu.org Status: RO Content-Length: 1806 Lines: 67 --===============1943784332== Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="dDRMvlgZJXvWKvBx" Content-Disposition: inline --dDRMvlgZJXvWKvBx Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Sat, Dec 04, 2004 at 04:25:22PM -0800, Dustin Sallings wrote: >=20 > On Dec 4, 2004, at 16:06, Tom Browder wrote: >=20 > >Does arch offer or plan to offer those three features (CVS rtag=20 > >equivalent, > >binary diff, CVSROOT equivalent)? >=20 > There has been discussion of binary diffs a while back, but I don't=20 > remember quite what came out of it. Arch already has the only kind of binary diff that is possible. It would be possible to compress the changesets better but there is little demand for this, to the point where nobody cares enough to do it. --=20 .''`. ** Debian GNU/Linux ** | Andrew Suffield : :' : http://www.debian.org/ | `. `' | `- -><- | --dDRMvlgZJXvWKvBx Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: Digital signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.5 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFBsnSklpK98RSteX8RAoCkAJ9vk16ElgxDeon188fSgcAm/QpDLQCfRCJD HTvv03tcNJ3K5XT0RO6d2Vo= =zFRh -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --dDRMvlgZJXvWKvBx-- --===============1943784332== Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline _______________________________________________ Gnu-arch-users mailing list Gnu-arch-users@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnu-arch-users GNU arch home page: http://savannah.gnu.org/projects/gnu-arch/ --===============1943784332==--