Received: from spf5.us4.outblaze.com (spf5.us4.outblaze.com [205.158.62.27]) by sdf.lonestar.org (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id iB51OH4M015968 for ; Sun, 5 Dec 2004 01:24:17 GMT Received: from lists.gnu.org (lists.gnu.org [199.232.76.165]) by spf5.us4.outblaze.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 559C677029 for ; Sun, 5 Dec 2004 01:24:20 +0000 (GMT) Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.33) id 1CalI3-00065K-TW for migo@homemail.com; Sat, 04 Dec 2004 20:34:19 -0500 Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.33) id 1CalHk-00064w-7o for gnu-arch-users@gnu.org; Sat, 04 Dec 2004 20:34:00 -0500 Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.33) id 1CalHj-00064k-S1 for gnu-arch-users@gnu.org; Sat, 04 Dec 2004 20:34:00 -0500 Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.33) id 1CalHj-00064h-OT for gnu-arch-users@gnu.org; Sat, 04 Dec 2004 20:33:59 -0500 Received: from [129.88.30.1] (helo=imag.imag.fr) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (TLSv1:DES-CBC3-SHA:168) (Exim 4.34) id 1Cal82-000116-1k for gnu-arch-users@gnu.org; Sat, 04 Dec 2004 20:23:58 -0500 Received: from ecrins.imag.fr (ecrins.imag.fr [129.88.43.124]) by imag.imag.fr (8.13.0/8.13.0) with ESMTP id iB51Afkw013312; Sun, 5 Dec 2004 02:10:41 +0100 (CET) Received: from moy by ecrins.imag.fr with local (Exim 3.35 #1) id 1CakvB-0006tK-00; Sun, 05 Dec 2004 02:10:41 +0100 To: Dustin Sallings References: <20041205000613.PNEI7152.lakermmtao09.cox.net@nonerjsnum1tkq> <26E1F314-4654-11D9-AD55-000A957659CC@spy.net> From: Matthieu Moy Mail-Followup-To: Dustin Sallings , "Tom Browder" , gnu-arch-users@gnu.org Date: Sun, 05 Dec 2004 02:10:41 +0100 In-Reply-To: <26E1F314-4654-11D9-AD55-000A957659CC@spy.net> (Dustin Sallings's message of "Sat, 4 Dec 2004 16:25:22 -0800") Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.1002 (Gnus v5.10.2) Emacs/21.2 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Greylist: Sender IP whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-1.4 (imag.imag.fr [129.88.30.1]); Sun, 05 Dec 2004 02:10:41 +0100 (CET) X-IMAG-MailScanner: Found to be clean X-IMAG-MailScanner-Information: Please contact the ISP for more information Cc: gnu-arch-users@gnu.org, Tom Browder Subject: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: Arch Versus CVS Versus Subversoin X-BeenThere: gnu-arch-users@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: a discussion list for all things arch-ish List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: gnu-arch-users-bounces+migo=homemail.com@gnu.org Errors-To: gnu-arch-users-bounces+migo=homemail.com@gnu.org Status: RO Content-Length: 638 Lines: 27 Dustin Sallings writes: > On Dec 4, 2004, at 16:06, Tom Browder wrote: > >> Does arch offer or plan to offer those three features (CVS rtag >> equivalent, >> binary diff, CVSROOT equivalent)? > > There has been discussion of binary diffs a while back, but I > don't remember quite what came out of it. Roughly : 1) Optional binary diff would be nice 2) Nobody has volunteered to do it -- Matthieu _______________________________________________ Gnu-arch-users mailing list Gnu-arch-users@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnu-arch-users GNU arch home page: http://savannah.gnu.org/projects/gnu-arch/