Received: from spf5.us4.outblaze.com (spf5.us4.outblaze.com [205.158.62.27]) by sdf.lonestar.org (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id iB50Mj0D029830 for ; Sun, 5 Dec 2004 00:22:46 GMT Received: from lists.gnu.org (lists.gnu.org [199.232.76.165]) by spf5.us4.outblaze.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id EE75776EBC for ; Sun, 5 Dec 2004 00:22:47 +0000 (GMT) Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.33) id 1CakKV-0004KU-UJ for migo@homemail.com; Sat, 04 Dec 2004 19:32:47 -0500 Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.33) id 1CakK8-0004KL-Ne for gnu-arch-users@gnu.org; Sat, 04 Dec 2004 19:32:24 -0500 Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.33) id 1CakK7-0004Jt-NM for gnu-arch-users@gnu.org; Sat, 04 Dec 2004 19:32:24 -0500 Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.33) id 1CakK7-0004Jq-JL for gnu-arch-users@gnu.org; Sat, 04 Dec 2004 19:32:23 -0500 Received: from [194.217.242.92] (helo=anchor-post-34.mail.demon.net) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.34) id 1CakA9-0008EL-3f for gnu-arch-users@gnu.org; Sat, 04 Dec 2004 19:22:05 -0500 Received: from cenderis.demon.co.uk ([62.49.17.254] helo=localhost) by anchor-post-34.mail.demon.net with esmtp (Exim 4.42) id 1CakA8-000CMp-E9 for gnu-arch-users@gnu.org; Sun, 05 Dec 2004 00:22:04 +0000 Received: by localhost (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 07A2F7C69C; Sun, 5 Dec 2004 00:22:04 +0000 (GMT) To: gnu-arch-users@gnu.org Subject: Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Arch Versus CVS Versus Subversoin References: <20041205000613.PNEI7152.lakermmtao09.cox.net@nonerjsnum1tkq> From: Bruce Stephens X-Hashcash: 1:22:041205:gnu-arch-users@gnu.org::liWfB5728f/24AxZ:0000000000000000000000000000000000000002yb3 Date: Sun, 05 Dec 2004 00:22:03 +0000 In-Reply-To: <20041205000613.PNEI7152.lakermmtao09.cox.net@nonerjsnum1tkq> (Tom Browder's message of "Sat, 4 Dec 2004 18:06:01 -0600") Message-ID: <87fz2lmw5w.fsf@cenderis.demon.co.uk> User-Agent: Gnus/5.1002 (Gnus v5.10.2) Emacs/21.3.50 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-BeenThere: gnu-arch-users@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: a discussion list for all things arch-ish List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: gnu-arch-users-bounces+migo=homemail.com@gnu.org Errors-To: gnu-arch-users-bounces+migo=homemail.com@gnu.org Status: RO Content-Length: 616 Lines: 20 "Tom Browder" writes: [...] > Does arch offer or plan to offer those three features (CVS rtag equivalent, > binary diff, CVSROOT equivalent)? tla's tag doesn't require a working tree. My guess is it's as close to CVS's rtag as is reasonably possible in Arch. Arch doesn't yet have a binary diff. tla does have a default archive, and I'd guess that's equivalent to CVSROOT. _______________________________________________ Gnu-arch-users mailing list Gnu-arch-users@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnu-arch-users GNU arch home page: http://savannah.gnu.org/projects/gnu-arch/