Received: from spf1.us4.outblaze.com (spf1.us4.outblaze.com [205.158.62.23]) by sdf.lonestar.org (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id iB4K2W9b025730 for ; Sat, 4 Dec 2004 20:02:32 GMT Received: from lists.gnu.org (lists.gnu.org [199.232.76.165]) by spf1.us4.outblaze.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 369EA539D0 for ; Sat, 4 Dec 2004 20:02:34 +0000 (GMT) Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.33) id 1CagGe-0001sm-Lo for migo@homemail.com; Sat, 04 Dec 2004 15:12:32 -0500 Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.33) id 1CagG6-0001qL-OX for gnu-arch-users@gnu.org; Sat, 04 Dec 2004 15:11:58 -0500 Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.33) id 1CagG6-0001q5-4W for gnu-arch-users@gnu.org; Sat, 04 Dec 2004 15:11:58 -0500 Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.33) id 1CagG5-0001pl-Vo for gnu-arch-users@gnu.org; Sat, 04 Dec 2004 15:11:58 -0500 Received: from [203.22.251.250] (helo=mg1.works.net.au) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (TLSv1:DES-CBC3-SHA:168) (Exim 4.34) id 1Cag6P-00080c-4J for gnu-arch-users@gnu.org; Sat, 04 Dec 2004 15:01:57 -0500 Received: from aardvark.ozdial.net.au (aardvark.ozdial.net.au [203.22.251.121]) by mg1.works.net.au (8.12.11/linuxconf) with ESMTP id iB4K22Ri008959; Sun, 5 Dec 2004 07:02:03 +1100 Received: from lifelesswks.robertcollins.net (dsl-253.4.240.220.rns01-kent-syd.dsl.comindico.com.au [220.240.4.253]) by aardvark.ozdial.net.au (8.12.8/linuxconf) with ESMTP id iB4K1mUK006420; Sun, 5 Dec 2004 07:01:50 +1100 Received: from host217-37-231-28.in-addr.btopenworld.com ([217.37.231.28] helo=lifelesslap.robertcollins.net) by lifelesswks.robertcollins.net with asmtp (Exim 4.34) id 1Cag6C-0000jc-FQ; Sun, 05 Dec 2004 07:01:45 +1100 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] ident=robertc) by lifelesslap.robertcollins.net with esmtp (Exim 4.34) id 1Cag5e-0005JC-Dv; Sun, 05 Dec 2004 07:01:10 +1100 Subject: Re: [Gnu-arch-users] [BUG] i18n (Re: Message translation - basic framework) From: Robert Collins To: Tez Kamihira In-Reply-To: <20040819.114448.71097995.tez@kamihira.com> References: <20040615.105821.74747648.tez@kamihira.com> <20040819.114448.71097995.tez@kamihira.com> Date: Sun, 05 Dec 2004 07:01:09 +1100 Message-Id: <1102190470.6937.18.camel@localhost> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.0.2 X-MG1-Works-MailScanner-Information: Please contact the ISP for more information X-MG1-Works-MailScanner: Found to be clean X-MG1-Works-MailScanner-SpamCheck: not spam, SpamAssassin (score=-4.285, required 5, BAYES_00 -4.90, RCVD_IN_NJABL_DUL 0.53, RCVD_IN_SORBS_DUL 0.09) X-MailScanner-From: rbcollins@cygwin.com Cc: Arch Users X-BeenThere: gnu-arch-users@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: a discussion list for all things arch-ish List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="===============0506819793==" Sender: gnu-arch-users-bounces+migo=homemail.com@gnu.org Errors-To: gnu-arch-users-bounces+migo=homemail.com@gnu.org Status: RO Content-Length: 1947 Lines: 68 --===============0506819793== Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="=-ZR2uNnJ63YIgvErps+wT" --=-ZR2uNnJ63YIgvErps+wT Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Thu, 2004-08-19 at 11:44 +0900, Tez Kamihira wrote: > A few days ago, some french translator asked me about i18n status of > GNU arch. Because my previous request went somewhere far away, I > re-send it to BUG GOO. >=20 > On the logical ground, my attempt woundn't be complicated at all, but > it triggers fairly amount of lines in tla's code, so it's almost > impossible for me to make another long lived tracking branch from > tom/jblack's main line and maintain it independently for a long time. Hi, I've looked at this and its not (currently) suitable for inclusion. It places po data for tla into package-framework, which is wrong : package-framework is a separate project (think autoconf) to tla. The correct way is to put common logic, but not data into package-framework, and the tla specific data & logic into tla itself. I'm going to see if I can hack something up based on your work though. Cheers, Rob --=-ZR2uNnJ63YIgvErps+wT Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.5 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQBBsheFM4BfeEKYx2ERAhrLAKCDhSJ3GoXDrEmtdDWnxvLNnIQZTwCgnisq vG7w6TuLX/oDnlDlq5yt3Yw= =XFa+ -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-ZR2uNnJ63YIgvErps+wT-- --===============0506819793== Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline _______________________________________________ Gnu-arch-users mailing list Gnu-arch-users@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnu-arch-users GNU arch home page: http://savannah.gnu.org/projects/gnu-arch/ --===============0506819793==--