Received: from spf1.us4.outblaze.com (spf1.us4.outblaze.com [205.158.62.23]) by sdf.lonestar.org (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id iATJrZOv011416 for ; Mon, 29 Nov 2004 19:53:36 GMT Received: from lists.gnu.org (lists.gnu.org [199.232.76.165]) by spf1.us4.outblaze.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A6F2F54708 for ; Mon, 29 Nov 2004 19:52:25 +0000 (GMT) Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.33) id 1CYrif-0002re-SM for migo@homemail.com; Mon, 29 Nov 2004 15:01:57 -0500 Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.33) id 1CYriF-0002rA-Bq for gnu-arch-users@gnu.org; Mon, 29 Nov 2004 15:01:31 -0500 Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.33) id 1CYriD-0002qN-UD for gnu-arch-users@gnu.org; Mon, 29 Nov 2004 15:01:30 -0500 Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.33) id 1CYriD-0002qK-QE for gnu-arch-users@gnu.org; Mon, 29 Nov 2004 15:01:29 -0500 Received: from [129.88.30.1] (helo=imag.imag.fr) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (TLSv1:DES-CBC3-SHA:168) (Exim 4.34) id 1CYrXp-0006yW-Ky for gnu-arch-users@gnu.org; Mon, 29 Nov 2004 14:50:46 -0500 Received: from ecrins.imag.fr (ecrins.imag.fr [129.88.43.124]) by imag.imag.fr (8.13.0/8.13.0) with ESMTP id iATJoeCc016856; Mon, 29 Nov 2004 20:50:41 +0100 (CET) Received: from moy by ecrins.imag.fr with local (Exim 3.35 #1) id 1CYrXk-0001iz-00; Mon, 29 Nov 2004 20:50:40 +0100 To: attila References: <16810.40699.480294.608044@evidence.my.domain> <16810.63930.922668.815695@evidence.my.domain> From: Matthieu Moy Mail-Followup-To: attila , gnu-arch-users@gnu.org Date: Mon, 29 Nov 2004 20:50:40 +0100 In-Reply-To: <16810.63930.922668.815695@evidence.my.domain> (attila@stalphonsos.com's message of "Mon, 29 Nov 2004 02:28:10 -0800") Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.1002 (Gnus v5.10.2) Emacs/21.2 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Greylist: Sender IP whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-1.4 (imag.imag.fr [129.88.30.1]); Mon, 29 Nov 2004 20:50:41 +0100 (CET) X-IMAG-MailScanner: Found to be clean X-IMAG-MailScanner-Information: Please contact the ISP for more information Cc: gnu-arch-users@gnu.org Subject: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: [Help-gnu-arch] tla-1.2 error: Missing inode signature... X-BeenThere: gnu-arch-users@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: a discussion list for all things arch-ish List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: gnu-arch-users-bounces+migo=homemail.com@gnu.org Errors-To: gnu-arch-users-bounces+migo=homemail.com@gnu.org Status: RO Content-Length: 447 Lines: 20 attila writes: > I take it that you mean something like > > $ rm -rf {arch}/++pristine-trees Yes, deleting '{arch}/++pristine-trees/' is safe if you have the bandwith to reconstruct it. -- Matthieu _______________________________________________ Gnu-arch-users mailing list Gnu-arch-users@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnu-arch-users GNU arch home page: http://savannah.gnu.org/projects/gnu-arch/