Received: from spf5.us4.outblaze.com (spf5.us4.outblaze.com [205.158.62.27]) by sdf.lonestar.org (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id iALMCm4h006538 for ; Sun, 21 Nov 2004 22:12:49 GMT Received: from lists.gnu.org (lists.gnu.org [199.232.76.165]) by spf5.us4.outblaze.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id EDAC677B4A for ; Sun, 21 Nov 2004 22:12:47 +0000 (GMT) Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.33) id 1CW05v-0004BB-84 for migo@homemail.com; Sun, 21 Nov 2004 17:22:07 -0500 Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.33) id 1CW05Y-0004AH-Bv for gnu-arch-users@gnu.org; Sun, 21 Nov 2004 17:21:44 -0500 Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.33) id 1CW05X-00049f-1k for gnu-arch-users@gnu.org; Sun, 21 Nov 2004 17:21:43 -0500 Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.33) id 1CW05W-00049c-W3 for gnu-arch-users@gnu.org; Sun, 21 Nov 2004 17:21:43 -0500 Received: from [66.216.124.41] (helo=server4.panoramicfeedback.com) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (TLSv1:DES-CBC3-SHA:168) (Exim 4.34) id 1CVzw1-00074r-Om for gnu-arch-users@gnu.org; Sun, 21 Nov 2004 17:11:54 -0500 Received: from [192.168.0.7] (server4.panoramicfeedback.com [66.216.124.41]) by server4.panoramicfeedback.com (8.12.3/8.12.3/Debian-6.6) with ESMTP id iALMBnil029918; Sun, 21 Nov 2004 17:11:49 -0500 Message-ID: <41A112A4.4070207@panoramicfeedback.com> Date: Sun, 21 Nov 2004 17:11:48 -0500 From: Aaron Bentley User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 0.8 (X11/20040926) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Zenaan Harkness Subject: Re: [Gnu-arch-users] diff markers/ star merge References: <1101070919.6134.11.camel@localhost.localdomain> In-Reply-To: <1101070919.6134.11.camel@localhost.localdomain> X-Enigmail-Version: 0.86.1.0 X-Enigmail-Supports: pgp-inline, pgp-mime Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Panometrics-MailScanner: Found to be clean Cc: arch X-BeenThere: gnu-arch-users@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: a discussion list for all things arch-ish List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: gnu-arch-users-bounces+migo=homemail.com@gnu.org Errors-To: gnu-arch-users-bounces+migo=homemail.com@gnu.org Status: RO Content-Length: 1416 Lines: 41 Zenaan Harkness wrote: > So, I can tla undo, tla star-merge then tla redo, except when I tla redo > I get the .rej conflict files rather than diff3 in-file markers. I realize that .rej files may be unfamiliar, but now that I'm used to them, I find them quite readable. The top half shows the text the patch was expecting, the bottom shows what the patch tried to turn it into. > Is there a way to play with my branches to achieve this (get the diff3 > in-file markers when I re-do)? AFAICT, there's no point in doing this. If you star-merge directly, you'll get the same thing, except that the conflicts will point the opposite way. But they'll still be inline conflicts that point the opposite way. However, I think it goes like this: $TREE_REVISION=$(tla logs -f|tail -n 1) tla tag -S $TREE_REVISION $TEMP_VERSION tla replay $TEMP_VERSION--base-0 tla commit -s "Temp copy of changes" $TEMP_VERSION tla apply-delta . $TREE_REVISION tla star-merge $UPSTREAM tla commit -s "Got latest upstream" tla star-merge -t $TEMP_VERSION The reason it's so complicated is that apply-delta doesn't have a --three-way parameter. Otherwise, it would just require a get and an apply-delta. Aaron _______________________________________________ Gnu-arch-users mailing list Gnu-arch-users@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnu-arch-users GNU arch home page: http://savannah.gnu.org/projects/gnu-arch/