Received: from spf3.us4.outblaze.com (spf3.us4.outblaze.com [205.158.62.25]) by sdf.lonestar.org (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id iALI0w4h027558 for ; Sun, 21 Nov 2004 18:00:58 GMT Received: from lists.gnu.org (lists.gnu.org [199.232.76.165]) by spf3.us4.outblaze.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9E7D054695 for ; Sun, 21 Nov 2004 18:00:54 +0000 (GMT) Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.33) id 1CVwA9-0006fh-BU for migo@homemail.com; Sun, 21 Nov 2004 13:10:13 -0500 Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.33) id 1CVw9h-0006fb-RN for gnu-arch-users@gnu.org; Sun, 21 Nov 2004 13:09:45 -0500 Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.33) id 1CVw9h-0006fP-Dw for gnu-arch-users@gnu.org; Sun, 21 Nov 2004 13:09:45 -0500 Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.33) id 1CVw9h-0006fM-An for gnu-arch-users@gnu.org; Sun, 21 Nov 2004 13:09:45 -0500 Received: from [84.0.0.31] (helo=melkor.bonehunter.rulez.org) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.34) id 1CVw0D-00014C-JD for gnu-arch-users@gnu.org; Sun, 21 Nov 2004 12:59:57 -0500 Received: from melkor (melkor [10.42.0.1]) by melkor.bonehunter.rulez.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 151CD68CD71; Sun, 21 Nov 2004 18:59:52 +0100 (CET) Subject: Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Please recommend a simple open source Unix for arch From: Gergely Nagy To: Andrew Wilcox In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain Date: Sun, 21 Nov 2004 18:59:51 +0100 Message-Id: <1101059991.5421.2.camel@melkor> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.0.2 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: gnu-arch-users@gnu.org X-BeenThere: gnu-arch-users@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: a discussion list for all things arch-ish List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: gnu-arch-users-bounces+migo=homemail.com@gnu.org Errors-To: gnu-arch-users-bounces+migo=homemail.com@gnu.org Status: RO Content-Length: 945 Lines: 26 > As I write this, I imagine someone is going to say, "but you can 'tar > configure make' on Debian too", and that's true. But why carry around > that bloat (helpful or not) if I'm not using it? Frankly, I find > having extra stuff around makes tracking down problems harder, because > it multiplies the possibilities of what could have gone wrong. > > I think I remember Tom saying sometime that he liked FreeBSD. Or was > it OpenBSD? Anyway, that's what I'm looking for, a suggestion for a > simple, modular open source Unix to run arch on. I'd recommend one of the BSDs (NetBSD or FreeBSD, in this order, but this is only my personal preference), or Slackware. Or a Linux you set up from scratch =) -- Gergely Nagy _______________________________________________ Gnu-arch-users mailing list Gnu-arch-users@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnu-arch-users GNU arch home page: http://savannah.gnu.org/projects/gnu-arch/