Received: from spf1.us4.outblaze.com (spf1.us4.outblaze.com [205.158.62.23]) by sdf.lonestar.org (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id iALHoX4h005936 for ; Sun, 21 Nov 2004 17:50:37 GMT Received: from lists.gnu.org (lists.gnu.org [199.232.76.165]) by spf1.us4.outblaze.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3257B54055 for ; Sun, 21 Nov 2004 17:50:34 +0000 (GMT) Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.33) id 1CVw08-0007fw-2b for migo@homemail.com; Sun, 21 Nov 2004 12:59:52 -0500 Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.33) id 1CVvzZ-0007fp-49 for gnu-arch-users@gnu.org; Sun, 21 Nov 2004 12:59:17 -0500 Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.33) id 1CVvzY-0007fd-MW for gnu-arch-users@gnu.org; Sun, 21 Nov 2004 12:59:16 -0500 Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.33) id 1CVvzY-0007fa-Gg for gnu-arch-users@gnu.org; Sun, 21 Nov 2004 12:59:16 -0500 Received: from [129.255.60.186] (helo=ct.radiology.uiowa.edu) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.34) id 1CVvqS-0007bD-NH for gnu-arch-users@gnu.org; Sun, 21 Nov 2004 12:49:52 -0500 Received: from [192.168.1.11] (12-217-241-0.client.mchsi.com [12.217.241.0]) by ct.radiology.uiowa.edu (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id iALHno328880; Sun, 21 Nov 2004 11:49:50 -0600 Message-ID: <41A0D53B.3080204@arbash-meinel.com> Date: Sun, 21 Nov 2004 11:49:47 -0600 From: John A Meinel User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 0.9 (Windows/20041103) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Andrew Wilcox Subject: Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Please recommend a simple open source Unix for arch References: In-Reply-To: X-Enigmail-Version: 0.89.0.0 X-Enigmail-Supports: pgp-inline, pgp-mime Cc: gnu-arch-users@gnu.org X-BeenThere: gnu-arch-users@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: a discussion list for all things arch-ish List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="===============0089223891==" Sender: gnu-arch-users-bounces+migo=homemail.com@gnu.org Errors-To: gnu-arch-users-bounces+migo=homemail.com@gnu.org Status: RO Content-Length: 3683 Lines: 97 This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 2440 and 3156) --===============0089223891== Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="------------enigE12E76816C7C07A0D3345691" This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 2440 and 3156) --------------enigE12E76816C7C07A0D3345691 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Andrew Wilcox wrote: > I'm looking for a suggestion for a simple, modular, open source Unix > to run arch on. With no extra cruft, packages, install scripts, or > "helpful" user interfaces. > > Few months ago I installed arch for the first time, took a used > computer and installed a fresh version of Debian to run it on. Why > Debian? No particular reason, it seemed to be a distribution strongly > in the spirit of open source volunteerism. Anyway, I found the Debian > install painful for a programmer such as myself... too many layers of > "helpful" user interface (I'd rather just edit the config file, thank > you very much), backports needed, Debian complaining I needed > something when I didn't or vis. versa... I ended up wasting my time > debugging the Debian install scripts. > > So I'm looking for a simplier, more old-fashioned Unix variant, > something where if I want to install something I say "tar xfz foo.tgz; > ./configure; make". And if I configure something, I do it directly > rather than run some helpful script that second-guesses me. > > As I write this, I imagine someone is going to say, "but you can 'tar > configure make' on Debian too", and that's true. But why carry around > that bloat (helpful or not) if I'm not using it? Frankly, I find > having extra stuff around makes tracking down problems harder, because > it multiplies the possibilities of what could have gone wrong. > > I think I remember Tom saying sometime that he liked FreeBSD. Or was > it OpenBSD? Anyway, that's what I'm looking for, a suggestion for a > simple, modular open source Unix to run arch on. > > Thank you, > > Andrew Wilcox I'm probably not the greatest person to answer this, as it sounds like you are wanting a very stripped down system. I haven't really used the any of the BSD systems, so these are my thoughts: Gentoo uses a ports system similar to the BSD systems. So it *should* be pretty easy to build stuff you want from source, since it is designed to be a system you can bootstrap from only sources. Slackware is known as a system for doing your own thing in (a lot of customizability, etc.) Personally, I think Redhat with the 'minimal install' is pretty good too. Though I'm pretty sure Tom would never advocate RH. :) I've been happy with it as a starting point. Good luck, John =:-> --------------enigE12E76816C7C07A0D3345691 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (Cygwin) Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFBoNU7JdeBCYSNAAMRAjW5AJ96wC3de/gD2K9Ou9lN3czahwPWMwCgiWEb YsHHMsEznmWdzo/0QHFptHA= =cbU1 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --------------enigE12E76816C7C07A0D3345691-- --===============0089223891== Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline _______________________________________________ Gnu-arch-users mailing list Gnu-arch-users@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnu-arch-users GNU arch home page: http://savannah.gnu.org/projects/gnu-arch/ --===============0089223891==--